2009•PubMedRequires access

Genotype-phenotype relationship between DNA repair gene genetic polymorphisms and DNA repair capacity.

Aesun Shin, Kyoung-Mu Lee, Byungchan Ahn, Chung‐Gyu Park, Sue-Kyung Noh, Dong-Young Park, Sei Hyun Ahn, Keun-Young Yoo, Daehee Kang

Open publisher page 43 citations

Abstract

Genotype-phenotype relationships between genetic polymorphisms of DNA repair genes and DNA repair capacity were evaluated in a case-control study of breast cancer. Selected DNA repair genes included were those involved in double-strand break repair (ATM, XRCC2, XRCC4, XRCC6, LIG4, RAD51, RAD52), base excision repair (LIG1), nucleotide excision repair (ERCC1), and mismatch repair (hMLH1). The subjects consisted of histologically confirmed breast cancer cases (n=132) and controls (n=75) with no present or previous history of cancer. Seventeen single nucleotide polymorphisms of 10 genes (ATM -5144A>T, IVS21+1049T>C, IVS33-55T>C, IVS34+60G>A, and 3393T>G, XRCC2 31479G/A, XRCC4 921G/T, XRCC6 1796G/T, LIG4 1977T/C, RAD51 135G/C, 172G/T, RAD52 2259C/T, LIG1 583A/C, ERCC1 8092A/C, 354C/T, hMLH1 5' region -93G/A, 655A/G) were determined by TaqMan assay (ATM) or MALDI-TOF (all other genes). DNA repair capacity was measured by a host cell reactivation assay of repair of ultraviolet damage. The DNA repair capacity (%) did not differ between cases (median 37.2, interquartile range: 23.6-59.6) and controls (median 32.7, interquartile range: 26.7-53.2). However, DNA repair capacity significantly differed by the genotypes of ATM and RAD51 genes among cancer-free controls. Our findings suggest that DNA repair capacity might be influenced by genetic polymorphisms of DNA damage response genes and DNA repair genes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Genotype-phenotype relationships between genetic polymorphisms of DNA repair genes and DNA repair capacity were evaluated in a case-control study of breast cancer. Selected DNA repair genes included were those involved in double-strand break repair (ATM, XRCC2, XRCC4, XRCC6, LIG4, RAD51, RAD52), base excision repair (LIG1), nucleotide excision repair (ERCC1), and mismatch repair (hMLH1). The subjects consisted of histologically confirmed breast cancer cases (n=132) and controls (n=75) with no present or previous history of cancer. Seventeen single nucleotide polymorphisms of 10 genes (ATM -5144A>T, IVS21+1049T>C, IVS33-55T>C, IVS34+60G>A, and 3393T>G, XRCC2 31479G/A, XRCC4 921G/T, XRCC6 1796G/T, LIG4 1977T/C, RAD51 135G/C, 172G/T, RAD52 2259C/T, LIG1 583A/C, ERCC1 8092A/C, 354C/T, hMLH1 5' region -93G/A, 655A/G) were determined by TaqMan assay (ATM) or MALDI-TOF (all other genes). DNA repair capacity was measured by a host cell reactivation assay of repair of ultraviolet damage. The DNA repair capacity (%) did not differ between cases (median 37.2, interquartile range: 23.6-59.6) and controls (median 32.7, interquartile range: 26.7-53.2). However, DNA repair capacity significantly differed by the genotypes of ATM and RAD51 genes among cancer-free controls. Our findings suggest that DNA repair capacity might be influenced by genetic polymorphisms of DNA damage response genes and DNA repair genes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 43 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Genotype-phenotype relationships between genetic polymorphisms of DNA repair genes and DNA repair capacity were evaluated in a case-control study of breast cancer. Selected DNA repair genes included were those involved in double-strand break repair (ATM, XRCC2, XRCC4, XRCC6, LIG4, RAD51, RAD52), base excision repair (LIG1), nucleotide excision repair (ERCC1), and mismatch repair (hMLH1). The subjects consisted of histologically confirmed breast cancer cases (n=132) and controls (n=75) with no present or previous history of cancer. Seventeen single nucleotide polymorphisms of 10 genes (ATM -5144A>T, IVS21+1049T>C, IVS33-55T>C, IVS34+60G>A, and 3393T>G, XRCC2 31479G/A, XRCC4 921G/T, XRCC6 1796G/T, LIG4 1977T/C, RAD51 135G/C, 172G/T, RAD52 2259C/T, LIG1 583A/C, ERCC1 8092A/C, 354C/T, hMLH1 5' region -93G/A, 655A/G) were determined by TaqMan assay (ATM) or MALDI-TOF (all other genes). DNA repair capacity was measured by a host cell reactivation assay of repair of ultraviolet damage. The DNA repair capacity (%) did not differ between cases (median 37.2, interquartile range: 23.6-59.6) and controls (median 32.7, interquartile range: 26.7-53.2). However, DNA repair capacity significantly differed by the genotypes of ATM and RAD51 genes among cancer-free controls. Our findings suggest that DNA repair capacity might be influenced by genetic polymorphisms of DNA damage response genes and DNA repair genes.

Key concepts: DNA repair protein XRCC4, DNA repair, ERCC1, Biology, XRCC1, Nucleotide excision repair, RAD51, Molecular biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Genotype-phenotype relationship between DNA repair gene genetic polymorphisms and DNA repair capacity. — Research Paper | ScholarLens