2009RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

Endogenous Entry in Markets with Adverse Selection

Thomas D. Jeitschko, Anthony Creane

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Since Akerlof's (1970) seminal paper the existence of adverse selection due to asymmetric information about quality is well-understood. Yet two questions remain. First, given the negative implications for trading and welfare, how do such markets come into existence? And second, why have many studies failed to flnd direct or indirect evidence of adverse selection? In addressing the flrst question directly we shed some light on the second. We consider a market in which flrms make an observable investment that generates products of a quality that becomes known only to the flrm. Entry has the tendency to lower prices, which may lead to adverse selection. The implied price collapse limits the amount of entry so that high prices are supported in the market equilibrium, which results in above normal proflts. While contributing to our understanding of markets with asymmetric information and ad- verse selection, the model also provides insight into the question of why markets with adverse selection are empirically hard to identify. The analysis suggests that rather than observing the canonical market collapse, such markets are instead characterized by less entry than would be empirically predicted and above normal proflts even in markets with low measures of concen- tration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since Akerlof's (1970) seminal paper the existence of adverse selection due to asymmetric information about quality is well-understood. Yet two questions remain. First, given the negative implications for trading and welfare, how do such markets come into existence? And second, why have many studies failed to flnd direct or indirect evidence of adverse selection? In addressing the flrst question directly we shed some light on the second. We consider a market in which flrms make an observable investment that generates products of a quality that becomes known only to the flrm. Entry has the tendency to lower prices, which may lead to adverse selection. The implied price collapse limits the amount of entry so that high prices are supported in the market equilibrium, which results in above normal proflts. While contributing to our understanding of markets with asymmetric information and ad- verse selection, the model also provides insight into the question of why markets with adverse selection are empirically hard to identify. The analysis suggests that rather than observing the canonical market collapse, such markets are instead characterized by less entry than would be empirically predicted and above normal proflts even in markets with low measures of concen- tration.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since Akerlof's (1970) seminal paper the existence of adverse selection due to asymmetric information about quality is well-understood. Yet two questions remain. First, given the negative implications for trading and welfare, how do such markets come into existence? And second, why have many studies failed to flnd direct or indirect evidence of adverse selection? In addressing the flrst question directly we shed some light on the second. We consider a market in which flrms make an observable investment that generates products of a quality that becomes known only to the flrm. Entry has the tendency to lower prices, which may lead to adverse selection. The implied price collapse limits the amount of entry so that high prices are supported in the market equilibrium, which results in above normal proflts. While contributing to our understanding of markets with asymmetric information and ad- verse selection, the model also provides insight into the question of why markets with adverse selection are empirically hard to identify. The analysis suggests that rather than observing the canonical market collapse, such markets are instead characterized by less entry than would be empirically predicted and above normal proflts even in markets with low measures of concen- tration.

Key concepts: Adverse selection, Information asymmetry, Economics, Quality (philosophy), Selection (genetic algorithm), Welfare, Microeconomics, Monetary economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Endogenous Entry in Markets with Adverse Selection — Research Paper | ScholarLens