Endogenous Entry in Markets with Adverse Selection
Thomas D. Jeitschko, Anthony Creane
Abstract
Thomas D. Jeitschko, Anthony Creane
Abstract
Since Akerlof's (1970) seminal paper the existence of adverse selection due to asymmetric information about quality is well-understood. Yet two questions remain. First, given the negative implications for trading and welfare, how do such markets come into existence? And second, why have many studies failed to flnd direct or indirect evidence of adverse selection? In addressing the flrst question directly we shed some light on the second. We consider a market in which flrms make an observable investment that generates products of a quality that becomes known only to the flrm. Entry has the tendency to lower prices, which may lead to adverse selection. The implied price collapse limits the amount of entry so that high prices are supported in the market equilibrium, which results in above normal proflts. While contributing to our understanding of markets with asymmetric information and ad- verse selection, the model also provides insight into the question of why markets with adverse selection are empirically hard to identify. The analysis suggests that rather than observing the canonical market collapse, such markets are instead characterized by less entry than would be empirically predicted and above normal proflts even in markets with low measures of concen- tration.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Since Akerlof's (1970) seminal paper the existence of adverse selection due to asymmetric information about quality is well-understood. Yet two questions remain. First, given the negative implications for trading and welfare, how do such markets come into existence? And second, why have many studies failed to flnd direct or indirect evidence of adverse selection? In addressing the flrst question directly we shed some light on the second. We consider a market in which flrms make an observable investment that generates products of a quality that becomes known only to the flrm. Entry has the tendency to lower prices, which may lead to adverse selection. The implied price collapse limits the amount of entry so that high prices are supported in the market equilibrium, which results in above normal proflts. While contributing to our understanding of markets with asymmetric information and ad- verse selection, the model also provides insight into the question of why markets with adverse selection are empirically hard to identify. The analysis suggests that rather than observing the canonical market collapse, such markets are instead characterized by less entry than would be empirically predicted and above normal proflts even in markets with low measures of concen- tration.
Key concepts: Adverse selection, Information asymmetry, Economics, Quality (philosophy), Selection (genetic algorithm), Welfare, Microeconomics, Monetary economics