2012Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft)Requires access

Accuracy studies for TDOA and TOA localization

Regina Kaune

Open publisher page 124 citations

Abstract

In sensor networks, passive localization can be performed by exploiting the received signals of unknown emitters. In this paper, the Time of Arrival (TOA) measurements are investigated. Often, the unknown time of emission is eliminated by calculating the difference between two TOA measurements where Time Difference of Arrival (TDOA) measurements are obtained. In TOA processing, additionally, the unknown time of emission is to be estimated. Therefore, the target state is extended by the unknown time of emission. A comparison is performed investigating the attainable accuracies for localization based on TDOA and TOA measurements given by the Crame?r-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB). Using the Maximum Likelihood estimator, some characteristic features of the cost functions are investigated indicating a better performance of the TOA approach. But counterintuitive, Monte Carlo simulations do not support this indication, but show the comparability of TDOA and TOA localization.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In sensor networks, passive localization can be performed by exploiting the received signals of unknown emitters. In this paper, the Time of Arrival (TOA) measurements are investigated. Often, the unknown time of emission is eliminated by calculating the difference between two TOA measurements where Time Difference of Arrival (TDOA) measurements are obtained. In TOA processing, additionally, the unknown time of emission is to be estimated. Therefore, the target state is extended by the unknown time of emission. A comparison is performed investigating the attainable accuracies for localization based on TDOA and TOA measurements given by the Crame?r-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB). Using the Maximum Likelihood estimator, some characteristic features of the cost functions are investigated indicating a better performance of the TOA approach. But counterintuitive, Monte Carlo simulations do not support this indication, but show the comparability of TDOA and TOA localization.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 124 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In sensor networks, passive localization can be performed by exploiting the received signals of unknown emitters. In this paper, the Time of Arrival (TOA) measurements are investigated. Often, the unknown time of emission is eliminated by calculating the difference between two TOA measurements where Time Difference of Arrival (TDOA) measurements are obtained. In TOA processing, additionally, the unknown time of emission is to be estimated. Therefore, the target state is extended by the unknown time of emission. A comparison is performed investigating the attainable accuracies for localization based on TDOA and TOA measurements given by the Crame?r-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB). Using the Maximum Likelihood estimator, some characteristic features of the cost functions are investigated indicating a better performance of the TOA approach. But counterintuitive, Monte Carlo simulations do not support this indication, but show the comparability of TDOA and TOA localization.

Key concepts: Multilateration, Time of arrival, Cramér–Rao bound, Estimator, Computer science, FDOA, Algorithm, Monte Carlo method

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Accuracy studies for TDOA and TOA localization — Research Paper | ScholarLens