2004•IEEE Transactions on ComputersRequires access

A prefetch taxonomy

Vijay Srinivasan, Edward S. Davidson, Gary Tyson

Open publisher page 59 citations

Abstract

The growing difference between processor and main memory cycle time demands the use of aggressive prefetch algorithms to reduce the effective memory access latency. However, prefetching can significantly increase memory traffic and unsuccessful prefetches may pollute the cache. Metrics such as coverage and accuracy result from a simplistic classification of individual prefetches as "good" or "bad." They do not capture the full effect of each prefetch and, hence, do not accurately reflect the quality of the prefetch algorithm. Gross statistics such as changes in the number of misses, total traffic, and IPC are not attributable to individual prefetches. Such gross metrics are therefore useful only for ranking existing prefetch algorithms; they do not evaluate the effect of individual prefetches so that an algorithm might be tuned. We introduce a new, accurate, and complete taxonomy, called the Prefetch Traffic and Miss Taxonomy (PTMT), for classifying each prefetch by precisely accounting for the difference in traffic and misses it generates, either directly or indirectly. We illustrate the use of PTMT by evaluating two data prefetch algorithms.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The growing difference between processor and main memory cycle time demands the use of aggressive prefetch algorithms to reduce the effective memory access latency. However, prefetching can significantly increase memory traffic and unsuccessful prefetches may pollute the cache. Metrics such as coverage and accuracy result from a simplistic classification of individual prefetches as "good" or "bad." They do not capture the full effect of each prefetch and, hence, do not accurately reflect the quality of the prefetch algorithm. Gross statistics such as changes in the number of misses, total traffic, and IPC are not attributable to individual prefetches. Such gross metrics are therefore useful only for ranking existing prefetch algorithms; they do not evaluate the effect of individual prefetches so that an algorithm might be tuned. We introduce a new, accurate, and complete taxonomy, called the Prefetch Traffic and Miss Taxonomy (PTMT), for classifying each prefetch by precisely accounting for the difference in traffic and misses it generates, either directly or indirectly. We illustrate the use of PTMT by evaluating two data prefetch algorithms.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 59 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The growing difference between processor and main memory cycle time demands the use of aggressive prefetch algorithms to reduce the effective memory access latency. However, prefetching can significantly increase memory traffic and unsuccessful prefetches may pollute the cache. Metrics such as coverage and accuracy result from a simplistic classification of individual prefetches as "good" or "bad." They do not capture the full effect of each prefetch and, hence, do not accurately reflect the quality of the prefetch algorithm. Gross statistics such as changes in the number of misses, total traffic, and IPC are not attributable to individual prefetches. Such gross metrics are therefore useful only for ranking existing prefetch algorithms; they do not evaluate the effect of individual prefetches so that an algorithm might be tuned. We introduce a new, accurate, and complete taxonomy, called the Prefetch Traffic and Miss Taxonomy (PTMT), for classifying each prefetch by precisely accounting for the difference in traffic and misses it generates, either directly or indirectly. We illustrate the use of PTMT by evaluating two data prefetch algorithms.

Key concepts: Instruction prefetch, Computer science, Storage management, Latency (audio), Cache, CAS latency, Ranking (information retrieval), Algorithm

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A prefetch taxonomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens