2006•Unpublished venueRequires access

Influence of Autocorrelation Lag Ranges on Robust Speech Recognition

Benjamin J. Shannon, Kuldip K. Paliwal

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

It is generally believed that the lower-lag autocorrelation coefficients carry information about the spectral envelope and the higher-lag autocorrelation coefficients are more related to pitch information. In this paper, we use lower-lag and higher-lag ranges of the autocorrelation function separately for deriving speech recognition features, and investigate their role in terms of speech recognition performance. The state-of-the-art MFCC (mel frequency cepstral coefficient) features use the whole autocorrelation function in their computation and are used here as a benchmark in our experiments. Our recognition results from the Aurora II corpus show that the higher-lag autocorrelation coefficients perform as well as the whole autocorrelation function for clean speech, and provide better performance for noisy speech, while lower-lag autocorrelation coefficients are not as effective in this aspect.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is generally believed that the lower-lag autocorrelation coefficients carry information about the spectral envelope and the higher-lag autocorrelation coefficients are more related to pitch information. In this paper, we use lower-lag and higher-lag ranges of the autocorrelation function separately for deriving speech recognition features, and investigate their role in terms of speech recognition performance. The state-of-the-art MFCC (mel frequency cepstral coefficient) features use the whole autocorrelation function in their computation and are used here as a benchmark in our experiments. Our recognition results from the Aurora II corpus show that the higher-lag autocorrelation coefficients perform as well as the whole autocorrelation function for clean speech, and provide better performance for noisy speech, while lower-lag autocorrelation coefficients are not as effective in this aspect.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is generally believed that the lower-lag autocorrelation coefficients carry information about the spectral envelope and the higher-lag autocorrelation coefficients are more related to pitch information. In this paper, we use lower-lag and higher-lag ranges of the autocorrelation function separately for deriving speech recognition features, and investigate their role in terms of speech recognition performance. The state-of-the-art MFCC (mel frequency cepstral coefficient) features use the whole autocorrelation function in their computation and are used here as a benchmark in our experiments. Our recognition results from the Aurora II corpus show that the higher-lag autocorrelation coefficients perform as well as the whole autocorrelation function for clean speech, and provide better performance for noisy speech, while lower-lag autocorrelation coefficients are not as effective in this aspect.

Key concepts: Autocorrelation, Lag, Autocorrelation technique, Mel-frequency cepstrum, Speech recognition, Spectral envelope, Computer science, Benchmark (surveying)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Influence of Autocorrelation Lag Ranges on Robust Speech Recognition — Research Paper | ScholarLens