2013ANU Open Research (Australian National University)Requires access

Research and Reflections on Zhang Taiyan

John Makeham

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Historians generally describe Zhang Taiyan (Binglin , 1869-1936) as an anti-Manchu revolutionary and treat his Buddhism as subordinate to this larger political project. Far less commonly understood is Zhang's role in preparing the groundwork for the establishment of Chinese philosophy as an academic discipline. Against the backdrop of an intellectual climate in Japan and China during the decades either side of 1900, in which a premium had come to be placed on logic as a precondition for the development of philosophy, Zhang was one of the first Chinese intellectuals to follow the lead of Japanese scholars in maintaining that classical Chinese philosophers had developed indigenous forms of logic. Significantly, he further argued that Chinese versions of Yogacara texts on Buddhist logic and epistemology (yinming ; Skt. hetu-vidya) made it possible once again to gain a proper understanding of China's earliest writings on logic. In this paper I argue that Zhang sought to establish that early Chinese texts "bear witness" to insights into realities that transcend individual cultures but are most fully and systematically articulated in Yogacara systems of learning; and that classical Chinese philosopher-sages had attained an awareness of the highest truths, evidence of which can be found in their writings. In short, I will show that Zhang used Yogacara to affirm the value of "Chinese philosophy" and, in doing so, helped shape its early definition.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Historians generally describe Zhang Taiyan (Binglin , 1869-1936) as an anti-Manchu revolutionary and treat his Buddhism as subordinate to this larger political project. Far less commonly understood is Zhang's role in preparing the groundwork for the establishment of Chinese philosophy as an academic discipline. Against the backdrop of an intellectual climate in Japan and China during the decades either side of 1900, in which a premium had come to be placed on logic as a precondition for the development of philosophy, Zhang was one of the first Chinese intellectuals to follow the lead of Japanese scholars in maintaining that classical Chinese philosophers had developed indigenous forms of logic. Significantly, he further argued that Chinese versions of Yogacara texts on Buddhist logic and epistemology (yinming ; Skt. hetu-vidya) made it possible once again to gain a proper understanding of China's earliest writings on logic. In this paper I argue that Zhang sought to establish that early Chinese texts "bear witness" to insights into realities that transcend individual cultures but are most fully and systematically articulated in Yogacara systems of learning; and that classical Chinese philosopher-sages had attained an awareness of the highest truths, evidence of which can be found in their writings. In short, I will show that Zhang used Yogacara to affirm the value of "Chinese philosophy" and, in doing so, helped shape its early definition.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Historians generally describe Zhang Taiyan (Binglin , 1869-1936) as an anti-Manchu revolutionary and treat his Buddhism as subordinate to this larger political project. Far less commonly understood is Zhang's role in preparing the groundwork for the establishment of Chinese philosophy as an academic discipline. Against the backdrop of an intellectual climate in Japan and China during the decades either side of 1900, in which a premium had come to be placed on logic as a precondition for the development of philosophy, Zhang was one of the first Chinese intellectuals to follow the lead of Japanese scholars in maintaining that classical Chinese philosophers had developed indigenous forms of logic. Significantly, he further argued that Chinese versions of Yogacara texts on Buddhist logic and epistemology (yinming ; Skt. hetu-vidya) made it possible once again to gain a proper understanding of China's earliest writings on logic. In this paper I argue that Zhang sought to establish that early Chinese texts "bear witness" to insights into realities that transcend individual cultures but are most fully and systematically articulated in Yogacara systems of learning; and that classical Chinese philosopher-sages had attained an awareness of the highest truths, evidence of which can be found in their writings. In short, I will show that Zhang used Yogacara to affirm the value of "Chinese philosophy" and, in doing so, helped shape its early definition.

Key concepts: Zhàng, Buddhism, China, Chinese philosophy, Witness, Philosophy, Epistemology, Value (mathematics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Research and Reflections on Zhang Taiyan — Research Paper | ScholarLens