Diaspora‐Homeland Relations as a Framework to Examine Nation‐Building Processes
Dan Lainer‐Vos
Abstract
Dan Lainer‐Vos
Abstract
Abstract This article examines diasporization practices – practices through which homeland and diaspora communities engage each other – as a prism through which to explore the process of nation‐building and the formation of national belonging. Instead of treating ‘nation’ or ‘diaspora’ as bounded entities, it explores the various ways through which members of diaspora communities negotiate their position vis‐à‐vis national homeland movements on the one hand and host societies on the other. Specifically, it examines practices of fundraising, diasporic lobbying, the extension of citizenship to members of diaspora communities, and the consumption of images through communication technologies. Through these ongoing, negotiated encounters, ‘homeland’ as well as ‘diaspora’ are produced. Close examination of these practices may offer fresh insights regarding the process of nation‐building in the diaspora that has a heuristic value beyond this particular setting.
OpenAlex reports 31 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract This article examines diasporization practices – practices through which homeland and diaspora communities engage each other – as a prism through which to explore the process of nation‐building and the formation of national belonging. Instead of treating ‘nation’ or ‘diaspora’ as bounded entities, it explores the various ways through which members of diaspora communities negotiate their position vis‐à‐vis national homeland movements on the one hand and host societies on the other. Specifically, it examines practices of fundraising, diasporic lobbying, the extension of citizenship to members of diaspora communities, and the consumption of images through communication technologies. Through these ongoing, negotiated encounters, ‘homeland’ as well as ‘diaspora’ are produced. Close examination of these practices may offer fresh insights regarding the process of nation‐building in the diaspora that has a heuristic value beyond this particular setting.
Key concepts: Diaspora, Homeland, Citizenship, Media studies, Sociology, Negotiation, Gender studies, Political science