Comparison of Immunohistochemistry and Virus Isolation for Diagnosis of West Nile Virus
Angela E. Ellis, Daniel G. Mead, Andrew B. Allison, Samantha E. J. Gibbs, Nicole Gottdenker, David E. Stallknecht, Elizabeth W. Howerth
Abstract
Angela E. Ellis, Daniel G. Mead, Andrew B. Allison, Samantha E. J. Gibbs, Nicole Gottdenker, David E. Stallknecht, Elizabeth W. Howerth
Abstract
Immunohistochemistry and virus isolation were performed on 1,057 birds. Immunohistochemistry, virus isolation, or both found 325 birds to be West Nile virus positive. Of these, 271 were positive by both methods. These results indicate that virus isolation and immunohistochemistry are approximately equal in their ability to detect West Nile virus.
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Immunohistochemistry and virus isolation were performed on 1,057 birds. Immunohistochemistry, virus isolation, or both found 325 birds to be West Nile virus positive. Of these, 271 were positive by both methods. These results indicate that virus isolation and immunohistochemistry are approximately equal in their ability to detect West Nile virus.
Key concepts: West Nile virus, Immunohistochemistry, Virus isolation, Virus, Virology, Biology, Isolation (microbiology), Microbiology