1997Vox SanguinisRequires access

Leukocyte Depletion and Storage of Single‐Donor Platelet Concentrates

Volker Weisbach, Alexander Putzo, Jürgen Zingsem, Matthias Riewald, R. Zimmermann, Reinhold Eckstein, Hanno Riess

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Because of widespread use of leukocyte reduction in platelet concentrates (PCs) and the need to store such concentrates, we investigated the effects of leukocyte depletion on the quality of stored PCs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten double-sized PCs were divided into 2 equal units which were tested simultaneously. One half was stored for 5 days after filtration through a polyester filter, the other one was stored unfiltered. RESULTS: The volume of the 10 "oversized' PCs was 483 +/- 40 ml (mean +/- standard deviation) and they contained 5.9 +/- 1.5 x 10(11) platelets and 80 +/- 23 x 10(6) leukocytes. Filtration significantly reduced the leukocyte concentration (168 +/- 56/microliter before, 6 +/- 4 /microliter after filtration) and leukocyte count (39.9 +/- 11.3 x 10(6) vs. 1.3 +/- 0.9 x 10(6); p < 0.0005). Filtration caused a platelet loss of 16%, the platelet count decreasing not significantly from 2.91 +/- 0.75 x 10(11) to 2.40 +/- 0.94 x 10(11) (p = 0.26). After 5 days of storage all parameters of platelet function (platelet aggregation to several stimuli, hypotonic shock reaction [HSR] and platelet retraction), mean platelet volume, and pH and pCO2 showed no advantage for PCs filtered prior to storage compared to PCs stored unfiltered. Moreover, platelet aggregation on day 5 using 4 agonists at 10 concentrations showed worse results in 4 assays in prestorage filtered PCs (collagen [4 micrograms/ml: p < 0.05, ADP [0.2 mM]: p < 0.05, ADP [0.3 mM]: p < 0.05, thrombin [0.6 E/ml]: p < 0.05). But there is no convincing trend in all aggregation tests, and HSR, presumably the most useful parameter, was not different or day 5. CONCLUSIONS: There is no advantage in terms of improved quality for prestorage leuko-depletion of PCs. Taking into account the obvious disadvantages of filtration, such as platelet loss and increasing costs per transfusion, we conclude that pre- or post-storage filtration of single-donor PCs should be done only for patients who have a clear indication for the transfusion of leukocyte-poor blood products.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Because of widespread use of leukocyte reduction in platelet concentrates (PCs) and the need to store such concentrates, we investigated the effects of leukocyte depletion on the quality of stored PCs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten double-sized PCs were divided into 2 equal units which were tested simultaneously. One half was stored for 5 days after filtration through a polyester filter, the other one was stored unfiltered. RESULTS: The volume of the 10 "oversized' PCs was 483 +/- 40 ml (mean +/- standard deviation) and they contained 5.9 +/- 1.5 x 10(11) platelets and 80 +/- 23 x 10(6) leukocytes. Filtration significantly reduced the leukocyte concentration (168 +/- 56/microliter before, 6 +/- 4 /microliter after filtration) and leukocyte count (39.9 +/- 11.3 x 10(6) vs. 1.3 +/- 0.9 x 10(6); p < 0.0005). Filtration caused a platelet loss of 16%, the platelet count decreasing not significantly from 2.91 +/- 0.75 x 10(11) to 2.40 +/- 0.94 x 10(11) (p = 0.26). After 5 days of storage all parameters of platelet function (platelet aggregation to several stimuli, hypotonic shock reaction [HSR] and platelet retraction), mean platelet volume, and pH and pCO2 showed no advantage for PCs filtered prior to storage compared to PCs stored unfiltered. Moreover, platelet aggregation on day 5 using 4 agonists at 10 concentrations showed worse results in 4 assays in prestorage filtered PCs (collagen [4 micrograms/ml: p < 0.05, ADP [0.2 mM]: p < 0.05, ADP [0.3 mM]: p < 0.05, thrombin [0.6 E/ml]: p < 0.05). But there is no convincing trend in all aggregation tests, and HSR, presumably the most useful parameter, was not different or day 5. CONCLUSIONS: There is no advantage in terms of improved quality for prestorage leuko-depletion of PCs. Taking into account the obvious disadvantages of filtration, such as platelet loss and increasing costs per transfusion, we conclude that pre- or post-storage filtration of single-donor PCs should be done only for patients who have a clear indication for the transfusion of leukocyte-poor blood products.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Because of widespread use of leukocyte reduction in platelet concentrates (PCs) and the need to store such concentrates, we investigated the effects of leukocyte depletion on the quality of stored PCs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten double-sized PCs were divided into 2 equal units which were tested simultaneously. One half was stored for 5 days after filtration through a polyester filter, the other one was stored unfiltered. RESULTS: The volume of the 10 "oversized' PCs was 483 +/- 40 ml (mean +/- standard deviation) and they contained 5.9 +/- 1.5 x 10(11) platelets and 80 +/- 23 x 10(6) leukocytes. Filtration significantly reduced the leukocyte concentration (168 +/- 56/microliter before, 6 +/- 4 /microliter after filtration) and leukocyte count (39.9 +/- 11.3 x 10(6) vs. 1.3 +/- 0.9 x 10(6); p < 0.0005). Filtration caused a platelet loss of 16%, the platelet count decreasing not significantly from 2.91 +/- 0.75 x 10(11) to 2.40 +/- 0.94 x 10(11) (p = 0.26). After 5 days of storage all parameters of platelet function (platelet aggregation to several stimuli, hypotonic shock reaction [HSR] and platelet retraction), mean platelet volume, and pH and pCO2 showed no advantage for PCs filtered prior to storage compared to PCs stored unfiltered. Moreover, platelet aggregation on day 5 using 4 agonists at 10 concentrations showed worse results in 4 assays in prestorage filtered PCs (collagen [4 micrograms/ml: p < 0.05, ADP [0.2 mM]: p < 0.05, ADP [0.3 mM]: p < 0.05, thrombin [0.6 E/ml]: p < 0.05). But there is no convincing trend in all aggregation tests, and HSR, presumably the most useful parameter, was not different or day 5. CONCLUSIONS: There is no advantage in terms of improved quality for prestorage leuko-depletion of PCs. Taking into account the obvious disadvantages of filtration, such as platelet loss and increasing costs per transfusion, we conclude that pre- or post-storage filtration of single-donor PCs should be done only for patients who have a clear indication for the transfusion of leukocyte-poor blood products.

Key concepts: Platelet, Chemistry, Filtration (mathematics), Mean platelet volume, Chromatography, Andrology, Immunology, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Leukocyte Depletion and Storage of Single‐Donor Platelet Concentrates — Research Paper | ScholarLens