1998Dentomaxillofacial RadiologyRequires access

An evaluation of periapical radiography with a charge-coupled device

Colin Versteeg, G C H Sanderink, Floris C. van Ginkel, Paul Frans van der Stelt

Open publisher page 46 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the standards of periapical radiography with a CCD-image receptor with film. METHODS: Three radiography technicians exposed a total of fifty teeth from all areas of the jaws using either size 1 or size 2 film and the Sidexis (Siemens, Bensheim, Germany) direct digital dental radiography system with the appropriate film holders. Image quality was assessed by two dental radiologists for nine individual criteria and overall, on a three-point scale. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between film and sensor exposures (P < 0.014). Six per cent of dental films required retakes compared with 28% with the sensor. CONCLUSION: Periapical radiography with a CCD sensor leads to more errors and thus more retakes than conventional film.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: To compare the standards of periapical radiography with a CCD-image receptor with film. METHODS: Three radiography technicians exposed a total of fifty teeth from all areas of the jaws using either size 1 or size 2 film and the Sidexis (Siemens, Bensheim, Germany) direct digital dental radiography system with the appropriate film holders. Image quality was assessed by two dental radiologists for nine individual criteria and overall, on a three-point scale. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between film and sensor exposures (P < 0.014). Six per cent of dental films required retakes compared with 28% with the sensor. CONCLUSION: Periapical radiography with a CCD sensor leads to more errors and thus more retakes than conventional film.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 46 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the standards of periapical radiography with a CCD-image receptor with film. METHODS: Three radiography technicians exposed a total of fifty teeth from all areas of the jaws using either size 1 or size 2 film and the Sidexis (Siemens, Bensheim, Germany) direct digital dental radiography system with the appropriate film holders. Image quality was assessed by two dental radiologists for nine individual criteria and overall, on a three-point scale. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between film and sensor exposures (P < 0.014). Six per cent of dental films required retakes compared with 28% with the sensor. CONCLUSION: Periapical radiography with a CCD sensor leads to more errors and thus more retakes than conventional film.

Key concepts: Radiography, Dentistry, Medicine, Orthodontics, Medical physics, Radiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An evaluation of periapical radiography with a charge-coupled device — Research Paper | ScholarLens