2011Journal of Geology and Mining ResearchOpen access

Evaluation of empirical formulae for the determination of hydraulic conductivity based on grain-size analysis

Jackson Makpane Ishaku, Emmanuel W. Gadzama, Usman Kaigama

Open full text 46 citations

Abstract

Several empirical formulae were used to determine the hydraulic conductivity of aquifer materials in the Jimeta-Yola area. The results indicate that the best estimation of hydraulic conductivity is based on Terzaghi equation, followed by Kozeny-Carman, Hazen, Breyer and Slitcher equations, respectively. The mean values from these equations were 1508, 287.1, 213.3, 186.9 and 102.3 m/day. The estimated hydraulic conductivities from the different methods indicate the hydraulic conductivity of clean sand to gravelly materials. USBR method underestimated the hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer materials in the area. The method, indicate the hydraulic conductivity of fine sand.   Key words: Hydraulic conductivity, aquifer, empirical formulae, Bima Sandstone, sieve analysis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Several empirical formulae were used to determine the hydraulic conductivity of aquifer materials in the Jimeta-Yola area. The results indicate that the best estimation of hydraulic conductivity is based on Terzaghi equation, followed by Kozeny-Carman, Hazen, Breyer and Slitcher equations, respectively. The mean values from these equations were 1508, 287.1, 213.3, 186.9 and 102.3 m/day. The estimated hydraulic conductivities from the different methods indicate the hydraulic conductivity of clean sand to gravelly materials. USBR method underestimated the hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer materials in the area. The method, indicate the hydraulic conductivity of fine sand.   Key words: Hydraulic conductivity, aquifer, empirical formulae, Bima Sandstone, sieve analysis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 46 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Several empirical formulae were used to determine the hydraulic conductivity of aquifer materials in the Jimeta-Yola area. The results indicate that the best estimation of hydraulic conductivity is based on Terzaghi equation, followed by Kozeny-Carman, Hazen, Breyer and Slitcher equations, respectively. The mean values from these equations were 1508, 287.1, 213.3, 186.9 and 102.3 m/day. The estimated hydraulic conductivities from the different methods indicate the hydraulic conductivity of clean sand to gravelly materials. USBR method underestimated the hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer materials in the area. The method, indicate the hydraulic conductivity of fine sand.   Key words: Hydraulic conductivity, aquifer, empirical formulae, Bima Sandstone, sieve analysis.

Key concepts: Hydraulic conductivity, Terzaghi's principle, Aquifer, Geotechnical engineering, Conductivity, Geology, Soil science, Groundwater

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of empirical formulae for the determination of hydraulic conductivity based on grain-size analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens