Chondrichthyan phylogeny: a look at the evidence
John G. Maisey
Abstract
John G. Maisey
Abstract
Chondrichthyans (sharks, rays and holocephalans) are subjected to cladistic analysis in order to identify possible monophyletic groups. Chondrichthyan monophyly is established on the basis of several apomorphic characters, of which the most convincing is the presence of a mineralized layer of prismatic perichondral tissue of a unique type. Modern elasmobranchs are united with the Jurassic Palaeospinax by several synapomorphies. Palaeospinax and some other fossil sharks are sequenced as successive sister-groups to modern elasmobranchs. It is concluded that elasmobranchs and chimaeroids are monophyletic sister-groups, but that sharks are not monophyletic unless holocephalans are included.
OpenAlex reports 124 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Chondrichthyans (sharks, rays and holocephalans) are subjected to cladistic analysis in order to identify possible monophyletic groups. Chondrichthyan monophyly is established on the basis of several apomorphic characters, of which the most convincing is the presence of a mineralized layer of prismatic perichondral tissue of a unique type. Modern elasmobranchs are united with the Jurassic Palaeospinax by several synapomorphies. Palaeospinax and some other fossil sharks are sequenced as successive sister-groups to modern elasmobranchs. It is concluded that elasmobranchs and chimaeroids are monophyletic sister-groups, but that sharks are not monophyletic unless holocephalans are included.
Key concepts: Monophyly, Synapomorphy, Sister group, Biology, Cladistics, Chondrichthyes, Zoology, Anatomy