2007Unpublished venueOpen access

Adoption of Conservation-Tillage Practices in Cotton Production

Swagata Banerjee, Steven W. Martin, Roland K. Roberts, James A. Larson, Robert J. Hogan, Jason L. Johnson, Kenneth W. Paxton, Jeanne M. Reeves, Banerjee, Swagata (Ban), Martin, Steven W., Roberts, Roland K., Larson, James A., Hogan, Robert J., Johnson, Jason L., Paxton, Kenneth W., Reeves, Jeanne M.

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

Agricultural Resource Management Survey data for 2003 were used to estimate logit models for adoption of conservation-tillage practices and herbicide-resistant/stacked-gene cottonseed in the United States. No endogenous relationship between these two adoption decisions was noticed. That is, the decision to simultaneously adopt those two technologies was not evidenced. However, results indicate each technology impacted the other independently. Prior experience with no-till was observed to have significant, positive impacts on both technologies, while the representative farmer’s college education, gross farm income, age, farming tenure , and a “highly erodible land” classification were not significant factors in determining the adoption of either technology.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Agricultural Resource Management Survey data for 2003 were used to estimate logit models for adoption of conservation-tillage practices and herbicide-resistant/stacked-gene cottonseed in the United States. No endogenous relationship between these two adoption decisions was noticed. That is, the decision to simultaneously adopt those two technologies was not evidenced. However, results indicate each technology impacted the other independently. Prior experience with no-till was observed to have significant, positive impacts on both technologies, while the representative farmer’s college education, gross farm income, age, farming tenure , and a “highly erodible land” classification were not significant factors in determining the adoption of either technology.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Agricultural Resource Management Survey data for 2003 were used to estimate logit models for adoption of conservation-tillage practices and herbicide-resistant/stacked-gene cottonseed in the United States. No endogenous relationship between these two adoption decisions was noticed. That is, the decision to simultaneously adopt those two technologies was not evidenced. However, results indicate each technology impacted the other independently. Prior experience with no-till was observed to have significant, positive impacts on both technologies, while the representative farmer’s college education, gross farm income, age, farming tenure , and a “highly erodible land” classification were not significant factors in determining the adoption of either technology.

Key concepts: Tillage, Production (economics), Agriculture, Conservation agriculture, Agricultural economics, Business, Agricultural science, Logit

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Adoption of Conservation-Tillage Practices in Cotton Production — Research Paper | ScholarLens