2009Unpublished venueRequires access

Layout optimizations for double patterning lithography

David Z. Pan, Jae-Seok Yang, Kun Yuan, Minsik Cho, Yongchan Ban

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

Deep sub-wavelength lithography is one of the most fundamental challenges for future scaling beyond 32 nm as the industry is currently stuck at the 193 nm lithography. Many ingenious technologies/tricks are developed to push the limit of 193 nm lithography, e.g., immersion lithography and computational lithography. But they may not be sufficient for 22 nm patterning. Meanwhile, next-generation lithography, such as EUV (Extreme Ultra-Violet) lithography may not be available for mass production in the near future. As a practical solution, double patterning lithography (DPL) has become a leading candidate for 22 nm (and likely 16 nm) lithography process. DPL poses new challenges for overlay control, layout decomposition, and up-stream physical designs. In this paper, we will discuss some recent advancements and challenges in layout decompositions and DPL friendly layout optimizations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Deep sub-wavelength lithography is one of the most fundamental challenges for future scaling beyond 32 nm as the industry is currently stuck at the 193 nm lithography. Many ingenious technologies/tricks are developed to push the limit of 193 nm lithography, e.g., immersion lithography and computational lithography. But they may not be sufficient for 22 nm patterning. Meanwhile, next-generation lithography, such as EUV (Extreme Ultra-Violet) lithography may not be available for mass production in the near future. As a practical solution, double patterning lithography (DPL) has become a leading candidate for 22 nm (and likely 16 nm) lithography process. DPL poses new challenges for overlay control, layout decomposition, and up-stream physical designs. In this paper, we will discuss some recent advancements and challenges in layout decompositions and DPL friendly layout optimizations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Deep sub-wavelength lithography is one of the most fundamental challenges for future scaling beyond 32 nm as the industry is currently stuck at the 193 nm lithography. Many ingenious technologies/tricks are developed to push the limit of 193 nm lithography, e.g., immersion lithography and computational lithography. But they may not be sufficient for 22 nm patterning. Meanwhile, next-generation lithography, such as EUV (Extreme Ultra-Violet) lithography may not be available for mass production in the near future. As a practical solution, double patterning lithography (DPL) has become a leading candidate for 22 nm (and likely 16 nm) lithography process. DPL poses new challenges for overlay control, layout decomposition, and up-stream physical designs. In this paper, we will discuss some recent advancements and challenges in layout decompositions and DPL friendly layout optimizations.

Key concepts: Extreme ultraviolet lithography, Lithography, Multiple patterning, Next-generation lithography, Computational lithography, Immersion lithography, Photolithography, Maskless lithography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Layout optimizations for double patterning lithography — Research Paper | ScholarLens