1994•Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic InvestigationOpen access

In Situ Analysis of Cellular Proliferation in Canine, Feline and Equine Tumors by Immunohistochemistry: A Comparison of Bromodeoxyuridine, Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen, and Interchromatin-Associated Antigen Immunostaining Techniques

Alain Pierre Théon, Loretta Metzger, Stephen M. Griffey

Open full text 14 citations

Abstract

Cell proliferation in canine, feline, and equine tumors was evaluated using immunohistochemical detection of in vitro 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and interchromatin-associated antigen (p105). Ten tumors in each species were analyzed. The tumor proliferative fraction (PF) was defined as the percentage of labeled nuclei for 5,000 tumor nuclei counted. Immunoreactivity was observed with all techniques in all species. A good correlation was observed between the proliferative fractions measured with the BrdU (PFBrdU) and PCNA (PFPCNA) techniques (rs = 0.523, P = 0.0026). There was no correlation between the PFs measured with the BrdU (PFBrdU) and p105 (PFP105) techniques. Using the median values obtained from the different approaches as cutoff points to define slowly and rapidly proliferating tumors, there was an 80% agreement (P = 0.009) between PFBrdU and PFPCNA and no agreement between PFBrdU and PFP105. The results of this study indicate that both BrdU and PCNA labeling methods can be used reliably for identifying proliferating cells in animal tumors. In addition, PCNA could be used to replace the BrdU method to assess tumor proliferative fraction because it does not require pretreatment of tissues.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Cell proliferation in canine, feline, and equine tumors was evaluated using immunohistochemical detection of in vitro 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and interchromatin-associated antigen (p105). Ten tumors in each species were analyzed. The tumor proliferative fraction (PF) was defined as the percentage of labeled nuclei for 5,000 tumor nuclei counted. Immunoreactivity was observed with all techniques in all species. A good correlation was observed between the proliferative fractions measured with the BrdU (PFBrdU) and PCNA (PFPCNA) techniques (rs = 0.523, P = 0.0026). There was no correlation between the PFs measured with the BrdU (PFBrdU) and p105 (PFP105) techniques. Using the median values obtained from the different approaches as cutoff points to define slowly and rapidly proliferating tumors, there was an 80% agreement (P = 0.009) between PFBrdU and PFPCNA and no agreement between PFBrdU and PFP105. The results of this study indicate that both BrdU and PCNA labeling methods can be used reliably for identifying proliferating cells in animal tumors. In addition, PCNA could be used to replace the BrdU method to assess tumor proliferative fraction because it does not require pretreatment of tissues.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Cell proliferation in canine, feline, and equine tumors was evaluated using immunohistochemical detection of in vitro 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and interchromatin-associated antigen (p105). Ten tumors in each species were analyzed. The tumor proliferative fraction (PF) was defined as the percentage of labeled nuclei for 5,000 tumor nuclei counted. Immunoreactivity was observed with all techniques in all species. A good correlation was observed between the proliferative fractions measured with the BrdU (PFBrdU) and PCNA (PFPCNA) techniques (rs = 0.523, P = 0.0026). There was no correlation between the PFs measured with the BrdU (PFBrdU) and p105 (PFP105) techniques. Using the median values obtained from the different approaches as cutoff points to define slowly and rapidly proliferating tumors, there was an 80% agreement (P = 0.009) between PFBrdU and PFPCNA and no agreement between PFBrdU and PFP105. The results of this study indicate that both BrdU and PCNA labeling methods can be used reliably for identifying proliferating cells in animal tumors. In addition, PCNA could be used to replace the BrdU method to assess tumor proliferative fraction because it does not require pretreatment of tissues.

Key concepts: Proliferating cell nuclear antigen, Bromodeoxyuridine, Immunohistochemistry, Immunostaining, Pathology, Biology, Antigen, Molecular biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
In Situ Analysis of Cellular Proliferation in Canine, Feline and Equine Tumors by Immunohistochemistry: A Comparison of Bromodeoxyuridine, Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen, and Interchromatin-Associated Antigen Immunostaining Techniques — Research Paper | ScholarLens