2003Review of SociologyRequires access

Cultural Reproduction or Cultural Mobility?

Zsuzsanna Blaskó

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

This paper investigates how the families' cultural milieu (the inherited cultural capital) has influenced the status attainment process in the Hungarian society in the past decades. Two alternative hypotheses are tested. On the one hand cultural reproduction theory (based on P. Bourdieu's hypothesis) suggests that cultural factors play a significant role in the reproduction of the social inequalities. On the other hand, however Paul DiMaggio and others assume that cultural capital is more a means of social mobility and can play a compensatory role, helping lower status children achieve above their parents. So far in Hungary the former function of cultural capital has been believed to be dominant. Our analyses show, however, that cultural reproduction and cultural mobility have both been present in this society. In fact, we find that until the 1960s children with the least educated parents could benefit the most from the family's cultural investments. Since then the tow processes have been of similar importance. Cultural assets have both helped the upper classes to maintain their existing positions but they have also provided a possible source for those occupying lower positions in the social hierarchy to support thir children getting forward.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper investigates how the families' cultural milieu (the inherited cultural capital) has influenced the status attainment process in the Hungarian society in the past decades. Two alternative hypotheses are tested. On the one hand cultural reproduction theory (based on P. Bourdieu's hypothesis) suggests that cultural factors play a significant role in the reproduction of the social inequalities. On the other hand, however Paul DiMaggio and others assume that cultural capital is more a means of social mobility and can play a compensatory role, helping lower status children achieve above their parents. So far in Hungary the former function of cultural capital has been believed to be dominant. Our analyses show, however, that cultural reproduction and cultural mobility have both been present in this society. In fact, we find that until the 1960s children with the least educated parents could benefit the most from the family's cultural investments. Since then the tow processes have been of similar importance. Cultural assets have both helped the upper classes to maintain their existing positions but they have also provided a possible source for those occupying lower positions in the social hierarchy to support thir children getting forward.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper investigates how the families' cultural milieu (the inherited cultural capital) has influenced the status attainment process in the Hungarian society in the past decades. Two alternative hypotheses are tested. On the one hand cultural reproduction theory (based on P. Bourdieu's hypothesis) suggests that cultural factors play a significant role in the reproduction of the social inequalities. On the other hand, however Paul DiMaggio and others assume that cultural capital is more a means of social mobility and can play a compensatory role, helping lower status children achieve above their parents. So far in Hungary the former function of cultural capital has been believed to be dominant. Our analyses show, however, that cultural reproduction and cultural mobility have both been present in this society. In fact, we find that until the 1960s children with the least educated parents could benefit the most from the family's cultural investments. Since then the tow processes have been of similar importance. Cultural assets have both helped the upper classes to maintain their existing positions but they have also provided a possible source for those occupying lower positions in the social hierarchy to support thir children getting forward.

Key concepts: Cultural capital, Cultural reproduction, Social reproduction, Reproduction, Social mobility, Sociology, Social class, Social capital

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cultural Reproduction or Cultural Mobility? — Research Paper | ScholarLens