1994Laboratory AnimalsRequires access

Interlaboratory comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) for detection of Bordetella bronchiseptica antibodies in guineaplgs

Michael Wullenweber, R. Boot

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Thirty-nine guinea pigs were examined for Bordetella bronchiseptica infection by culture and serology, using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) test. Each serological method detected evidence of B. bronchiseptica infection in more guinea pigs than did culture. IIF using an antigen prepared from a mouse isolate of B. bronchiseptica detected fewer infected guinea pigs than when performed with antigens prepared from B. bronchiseptica isolates from a rat, a dog and a guinea pig. ELISA and IIF detected a comparable incidence of infection. Cross-reactivity was investigated further by carrying out ELISAs using 5 antigens prepared from B. bronchiseptica isolates from different species and antiserum to these antigens raised in non-infected guinea pigs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Thirty-nine guinea pigs were examined for Bordetella bronchiseptica infection by culture and serology, using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) test. Each serological method detected evidence of B. bronchiseptica infection in more guinea pigs than did culture. IIF using an antigen prepared from a mouse isolate of B. bronchiseptica detected fewer infected guinea pigs than when performed with antigens prepared from B. bronchiseptica isolates from a rat, a dog and a guinea pig. ELISA and IIF detected a comparable incidence of infection. Cross-reactivity was investigated further by carrying out ELISAs using 5 antigens prepared from B. bronchiseptica isolates from different species and antiserum to these antigens raised in non-infected guinea pigs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Thirty-nine guinea pigs were examined for Bordetella bronchiseptica infection by culture and serology, using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) test. Each serological method detected evidence of B. bronchiseptica infection in more guinea pigs than did culture. IIF using an antigen prepared from a mouse isolate of B. bronchiseptica detected fewer infected guinea pigs than when performed with antigens prepared from B. bronchiseptica isolates from a rat, a dog and a guinea pig. ELISA and IIF detected a comparable incidence of infection. Cross-reactivity was investigated further by carrying out ELISAs using 5 antigens prepared from B. bronchiseptica isolates from different species and antiserum to these antigens raised in non-infected guinea pigs.

Key concepts: IIf, Bordetella bronchiseptica, Serology, Antigen, Biology, Microbiology, Immunofluorescence, Antibody

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interlaboratory comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) for detection of Bordetella bronchiseptica antibodies in guineaplgs — Research Paper | ScholarLens