Detection performance of the trimmed-mean CFAR processor with noncoherent integration
Mohamed B. El Mashade
Abstract
Mohamed B. El Mashade
Abstract
The ordered-statistic constant false alarm rate (OS-CFAR) detector has some advantages over the cell-averaging (CA) CFAR scheme, especially in cases where more than one target is present within the reference window or where this reference window is crossing clutter edges. The trimmed-mean (TM) CFAR processor is a more generalised OS-CFAR scheme which combines ordering and arithmetic averaging. The author analyses the detection performance of the TM-CFAR scheme when noncoherent integration is used under the chi-square target fluctuation model. For specific values of the trimming parameters, the performance of the TM-CFAR processor reduces to that of the CA-CFAR and OS-CFAR schemes. Results are depicted for the Swerling case II target model and for a homogeneous environment. As the number of noncoherently integrated pulses increases, lower threshold values and better performances are obtained for the three schemes considered.
OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The ordered-statistic constant false alarm rate (OS-CFAR) detector has some advantages over the cell-averaging (CA) CFAR scheme, especially in cases where more than one target is present within the reference window or where this reference window is crossing clutter edges. The trimmed-mean (TM) CFAR processor is a more generalised OS-CFAR scheme which combines ordering and arithmetic averaging. The author analyses the detection performance of the TM-CFAR scheme when noncoherent integration is used under the chi-square target fluctuation model. For specific values of the trimming parameters, the performance of the TM-CFAR processor reduces to that of the CA-CFAR and OS-CFAR schemes. Results are depicted for the Swerling case II target model and for a homogeneous environment. As the number of noncoherently integrated pulses increases, lower threshold values and better performances are obtained for the three schemes considered.
Key concepts: Constant false alarm rate, Truncated mean, Clutter, Algorithm, Trimming, Detector, Statistic, Mathematics