1998•Journal of Consumer AffairsRequires access

Enhancing Consumer Choice: Are We Making Appropriate Recommendations?

Jinkook Lee, Loren V. Geistfeld

Open publisher page 33 citations

Abstract

To reduce information search costs, consumers often use choice‐making aids. If these aids are to help consumers make choices consistent with their own preferences, as well as reduce search effort, they must be based on choke models consistent with consumers' true preference sets. This study used conjoint analysis to identify these ideal choice models. Thirty‐six percent of the subjects were found to use compensatory choice models and 64 percent noncompensatory models. The results suggest a need to base choice‐making aids on ideal choice models if the aid is to lead consumers to decisions consistent with true preferences.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To reduce information search costs, consumers often use choice‐making aids. If these aids are to help consumers make choices consistent with their own preferences, as well as reduce search effort, they must be based on choke models consistent with consumers' true preference sets. This study used conjoint analysis to identify these ideal choice models. Thirty‐six percent of the subjects were found to use compensatory choice models and 64 percent noncompensatory models. The results suggest a need to base choice‐making aids on ideal choice models if the aid is to lead consumers to decisions consistent with true preferences.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To reduce information search costs, consumers often use choice‐making aids. If these aids are to help consumers make choices consistent with their own preferences, as well as reduce search effort, they must be based on choke models consistent with consumers' true preference sets. This study used conjoint analysis to identify these ideal choice models. Thirty‐six percent of the subjects were found to use compensatory choice models and 64 percent noncompensatory models. The results suggest a need to base choice‐making aids on ideal choice models if the aid is to lead consumers to decisions consistent with true preferences.

Key concepts: Consumer choice, Preference, Conjoint analysis, Choice set, Ideal (ethics), Economics, Discrete choice, Revealed preference

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Enhancing Consumer Choice: Are We Making Appropriate Recommendations? — Research Paper | ScholarLens