2002Acta PaediatricaRequires access

Body composition, as assessed by bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy and dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry, in a healthy paediatric population

Hans Fors, Lars Gelander, Ragnar Bjarnason, Kerstin Albertsson‐Wikland, Ingvar Bosæus

Open publisher page 53 citations

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to determine the level of agreement between body composition measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and multifrequency bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS). Fat-free mass (FFM), body fat mass and body fatness (percentage fat) were measured by DXA, BIA and BIS in 61 healthy children (37M, 24F, aged 10.9-13.9 y). Estimates of FFM, body fat mass and body fatness were highly correlated (r = 0.73-0.96, p < 0.0001) between the different methods. However, a Bland-Altman comparison showed wide limits of agreement between the methods. The mean differences between methods for FFM ranged from -2.31 +/- 7.76 kg to 0.48 +/- 7.58 kg. Mean differences for body fat mass ranged from 0.16 +/- 5.06 kg to 2.95 +/- 5.65 kg and for body fatness from -2.3 +/- 7.8% to 0.8 +/- 9.3%. Calculations of body composition with BIS were not superior to BIA. However, BIA overestimated fat mass in lean, subjects and underestimated fat mass in overweight subjects more than BIS, compared with DXA. CONCLUSION: The methods used provided estimates of FFM, body fat mass and body fatness that were highly correlated in a population of healthy children. However, the large limits of agreement derived from the Bland-Altman procedure suggest that the methods should not be used interchangeably.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to determine the level of agreement between body composition measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and multifrequency bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS). Fat-free mass (FFM), body fat mass and body fatness (percentage fat) were measured by DXA, BIA and BIS in 61 healthy children (37M, 24F, aged 10.9-13.9 y). Estimates of FFM, body fat mass and body fatness were highly correlated (r = 0.73-0.96, p < 0.0001) between the different methods. However, a Bland-Altman comparison showed wide limits of agreement between the methods. The mean differences between methods for FFM ranged from -2.31 +/- 7.76 kg to 0.48 +/- 7.58 kg. Mean differences for body fat mass ranged from 0.16 +/- 5.06 kg to 2.95 +/- 5.65 kg and for body fatness from -2.3 +/- 7.8% to 0.8 +/- 9.3%. Calculations of body composition with BIS were not superior to BIA. However, BIA overestimated fat mass in lean, subjects and underestimated fat mass in overweight subjects more than BIS, compared with DXA. CONCLUSION: The methods used provided estimates of FFM, body fat mass and body fatness that were highly correlated in a population of healthy children. However, the large limits of agreement derived from the Bland-Altman procedure suggest that the methods should not be used interchangeably.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 53 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to determine the level of agreement between body composition measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and multifrequency bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS). Fat-free mass (FFM), body fat mass and body fatness (percentage fat) were measured by DXA, BIA and BIS in 61 healthy children (37M, 24F, aged 10.9-13.9 y). Estimates of FFM, body fat mass and body fatness were highly correlated (r = 0.73-0.96, p < 0.0001) between the different methods. However, a Bland-Altman comparison showed wide limits of agreement between the methods. The mean differences between methods for FFM ranged from -2.31 +/- 7.76 kg to 0.48 +/- 7.58 kg. Mean differences for body fat mass ranged from 0.16 +/- 5.06 kg to 2.95 +/- 5.65 kg and for body fatness from -2.3 +/- 7.8% to 0.8 +/- 9.3%. Calculations of body composition with BIS were not superior to BIA. However, BIA overestimated fat mass in lean, subjects and underestimated fat mass in overweight subjects more than BIS, compared with DXA. CONCLUSION: The methods used provided estimates of FFM, body fat mass and body fatness that were highly correlated in a population of healthy children. However, the large limits of agreement derived from the Bland-Altman procedure suggest that the methods should not be used interchangeably.

Key concepts: Bioelectrical impedance analysis, Medicine, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Overweight, Lean body mass, Fat mass, Limits of agreement, Fat free mass

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Body composition, as assessed by bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy and dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry, in a healthy paediatric population — Research Paper | ScholarLens