Triggered vacuum and gas spark gaps

This paper presents a comparative analysis of the characteristics for the gas insulated three-electrode spark gaps and vacuum insulated three-electrode spark gaps. The experimental part of this paper includes the testing of spark gap models. Two spark gap types were studied: one having the third electrode inside the main electrode and one having a separate third electrode, both being insulated by vacuum or gas (under pressure, providing the same operating voltage as for a vacuum insulated spark gap). Both types of spark gaps were theoretically sized in the optimal way. Several characteristics are determined experimentally: the influence of the gas and vacuum insulation parameters on the spark gap functioning, the influence of the rate of rise and injected energy of the triggering pulse on the spark gap functioning, and the degree of spark gap erosion vs. number of operations (long-time-stability). Two types of gases were applied: SF/sub 6/ gas, N/sub 2/ gas and three vacuum (residual) pressures: 10/sup -1/ Pa, 10/sup -4/ Pa, and 10/sup -6/ Pa. Three electrode materials were used: copper, steel and tungsten. The spark gap switching time and delay time are measured. It was found that the switching time decreases with application of pressure decrease, and the statistical dispersion of switching time raises with the pressure decrease. By comparison of results obtained for the vacuum insulated spark gap and the SF/sub 6/ or N/sub 2/ gas insulated spark gap, it was found that the vacuum spark gap has a slightly shorter switching time and a significantly higher corresponding statistical dispersion.