2013Online Journal of OtolaryngologyRequires access

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MANAGEMENT WITH MYRINGOPLASTY AND CHEMICAL CAUTERISATION IN TUBO-TYMPANIC TYPE OF CHRONIC SUPPURATIVE OTITIS MEDIA -

Kiran Jaywant Shinde, Amit Kumar Singh

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction CSOM is highly prevalent chronic ear disease. In developing countries like India, where tertiary medical facility is not available to all people, treatment should be cost effective and easily feasible at even primary health centre. With this background a study was performed for closure of small to moderate central perforation with chemical cauterisation and to see whether it is equally effective as that of Myringoplasty or not. Study design: prospective clinical study. Methodology: To compare results of chemical cauterisation (TCA) with myringoplasty on non healing small and medium sized central tympanic membrane perforation of pars tensa, 100 patients with dry tympanic membrane perforations. Result: 1) Success rate with myringoplasty and chemical cauterisation were 76% and 72% respectively. 2) The improvement of hearing at 3rd month of follow-up after successful procedure with myringoplasty and chemical cauterisation in term of air bone gap less than 10 db were 68.4% and 88.88% respectively Conclusion: 1) For closure of small central perforation chemical cauterisation is equally effective as myringoplasty. 2) For closure of moderate central perforation, myringoplasty is superior to chemical cauterisation. 3) Hearing improvement was observed better for chemical cauterisation as compared to Myringoplasty.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction CSOM is highly prevalent chronic ear disease. In developing countries like India, where tertiary medical facility is not available to all people, treatment should be cost effective and easily feasible at even primary health centre. With this background a study was performed for closure of small to moderate central perforation with chemical cauterisation and to see whether it is equally effective as that of Myringoplasty or not. Study design: prospective clinical study. Methodology: To compare results of chemical cauterisation (TCA) with myringoplasty on non healing small and medium sized central tympanic membrane perforation of pars tensa, 100 patients with dry tympanic membrane perforations. Result: 1) Success rate with myringoplasty and chemical cauterisation were 76% and 72% respectively. 2) The improvement of hearing at 3rd month of follow-up after successful procedure with myringoplasty and chemical cauterisation in term of air bone gap less than 10 db were 68.4% and 88.88% respectively Conclusion: 1) For closure of small central perforation chemical cauterisation is equally effective as myringoplasty. 2) For closure of moderate central perforation, myringoplasty is superior to chemical cauterisation. 3) Hearing improvement was observed better for chemical cauterisation as compared to Myringoplasty.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction CSOM is highly prevalent chronic ear disease. In developing countries like India, where tertiary medical facility is not available to all people, treatment should be cost effective and easily feasible at even primary health centre. With this background a study was performed for closure of small to moderate central perforation with chemical cauterisation and to see whether it is equally effective as that of Myringoplasty or not. Study design: prospective clinical study. Methodology: To compare results of chemical cauterisation (TCA) with myringoplasty on non healing small and medium sized central tympanic membrane perforation of pars tensa, 100 patients with dry tympanic membrane perforations. Result: 1) Success rate with myringoplasty and chemical cauterisation were 76% and 72% respectively. 2) The improvement of hearing at 3rd month of follow-up after successful procedure with myringoplasty and chemical cauterisation in term of air bone gap less than 10 db were 68.4% and 88.88% respectively Conclusion: 1) For closure of small central perforation chemical cauterisation is equally effective as myringoplasty. 2) For closure of moderate central perforation, myringoplasty is superior to chemical cauterisation. 3) Hearing improvement was observed better for chemical cauterisation as compared to Myringoplasty.

Key concepts: Myringoplasty, Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media, Medicine, Tympanic Membrane Perforation, Perforation, Surgery, Otologic Surgical Procedures, Tympanoplasty

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MANAGEMENT WITH MYRINGOPLASTY AND CHEMICAL CAUTERISATION IN TUBO-TYMPANIC TYPE OF CHRONIC SUPPURATIVE OTITIS MEDIA - — Research Paper | ScholarLens