1994•Social ForcesRequires access

Resource Mobilization, Hardship, and Popular Collective Action in the West Bank

Mikail Khawaja

Open publisher page 53 citations

Abstract

Though empirical support for resource mobilization explanations of collective action in the U.S. is strong, it is still uncertain whether the theory offers adequate explanations for collective action in nonaffluent or crisis-ridden settings. This article examines whether collective action increases as a function of increased hardship or improved political opportunities and/or economic resources for mobilization in the West Bank context. This question is evaluated by parametric statistical models and event history data on collective political events that occurred in the area over the 1976-85 period. The analysis reveals that resource mobilization explanations were far superior in explaining collective action in the present case than the deprivation account. However, contrary to expectations, direct repression increased the rate of Palestinian collective action while state vulnerability decreased it during the period examined. 7he findings also indicate

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Though empirical support for resource mobilization explanations of collective action in the U.S. is strong, it is still uncertain whether the theory offers adequate explanations for collective action in nonaffluent or crisis-ridden settings. This article examines whether collective action increases as a function of increased hardship or improved political opportunities and/or economic resources for mobilization in the West Bank context. This question is evaluated by parametric statistical models and event history data on collective political events that occurred in the area over the 1976-85 period. The analysis reveals that resource mobilization explanations were far superior in explaining collective action in the present case than the deprivation account. However, contrary to expectations, direct repression increased the rate of Palestinian collective action while state vulnerability decreased it during the period examined. 7he findings also indicate

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 53 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Though empirical support for resource mobilization explanations of collective action in the U.S. is strong, it is still uncertain whether the theory offers adequate explanations for collective action in nonaffluent or crisis-ridden settings. This article examines whether collective action increases as a function of increased hardship or improved political opportunities and/or economic resources for mobilization in the West Bank context. This question is evaluated by parametric statistical models and event history data on collective political events that occurred in the area over the 1976-85 period. The analysis reveals that resource mobilization explanations were far superior in explaining collective action in the present case than the deprivation account. However, contrary to expectations, direct repression increased the rate of Palestinian collective action while state vulnerability decreased it during the period examined. 7he findings also indicate

Key concepts: Collective action, Mobilization, Resource mobilization, Context (archaeology), Vulnerability (computing), Action (physics), Political opportunity, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Resource Mobilization, Hardship, and Popular Collective Action in the West Bank — Research Paper | ScholarLens