2011Unpublished venueRequires access

Does skill-biased technological change necessarily cause increase in wage inequality?

Zhicheng Xu, Yan Jia, Zhang Ping

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The 1990s consensus among labor economists is that skill-biased technological change labeled the wide use of computers and IT since late 1970s, lifted up the demand for skilled workers so as to increase the college premium, i.e., wage inequality between different educated groups. However, 1990s consensus is not consistent with the fact that college premium declined in some decades. Challenging the pessimistic 1990s consensus, this paper develops a long run evolution model that captures the influence of skill-biased technological change on the wage inequality. The proposed dynamical model, in which both of the technological change and wage inequality are endogenous, indicates that considering the education efficiency, skill-biased technological change would increase the wage inequality in the short run, while the wage inequality would decline finally in the long term, if the efficiency of education system is at an appropriate level.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The 1990s consensus among labor economists is that skill-biased technological change labeled the wide use of computers and IT since late 1970s, lifted up the demand for skilled workers so as to increase the college premium, i.e., wage inequality between different educated groups. However, 1990s consensus is not consistent with the fact that college premium declined in some decades. Challenging the pessimistic 1990s consensus, this paper develops a long run evolution model that captures the influence of skill-biased technological change on the wage inequality. The proposed dynamical model, in which both of the technological change and wage inequality are endogenous, indicates that considering the education efficiency, skill-biased technological change would increase the wage inequality in the short run, while the wage inequality would decline finally in the long term, if the efficiency of education system is at an appropriate level.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The 1990s consensus among labor economists is that skill-biased technological change labeled the wide use of computers and IT since late 1970s, lifted up the demand for skilled workers so as to increase the college premium, i.e., wage inequality between different educated groups. However, 1990s consensus is not consistent with the fact that college premium declined in some decades. Challenging the pessimistic 1990s consensus, this paper develops a long run evolution model that captures the influence of skill-biased technological change on the wage inequality. The proposed dynamical model, in which both of the technological change and wage inequality are endogenous, indicates that considering the education efficiency, skill-biased technological change would increase the wage inequality in the short run, while the wage inequality would decline finally in the long term, if the efficiency of education system is at an appropriate level.

Key concepts: Wage inequality, Technological change, Economics, Inequality, Wage, Pessimism, Labour economics, Technical change

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Does skill-biased technological change necessarily cause increase in wage inequality? — Research Paper | ScholarLens