2006Unpublished venueRequires access

Efficiency Study of TCP Protocols in InfrastructuredWireless Networks

Milan Todorovic, N. Lopez-Benitez

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

Traditional TCP protocols treat all packet loss as a sign of congestion. Their inability to recognize non-congestion related packet loss has significant effects on the communication efficiency in the wireless networks. Recently proposed protocols such as Freeze-TCP, TCP-Probing, TCP Westwood/Westwood+, TCP Veno, TCP-Jersey, and JTCP, all imp rove over th e traditional TCP p ro to cols. This paper reports a quantitative comparison of recent protocols against the currently most often used namely, TCP SACK, TCP NewReno, and TCP Vegas. Simulation tests were designed for various network layouts, and with differing external interferences in an attempt to most accurately simulate real-life scenarios. To carry out these comparisons, the performance of each protocol was measured based on three benchmark metrics: throughput, average congestion window, and time to complete a file transfer.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Traditional TCP protocols treat all packet loss as a sign of congestion. Their inability to recognize non-congestion related packet loss has significant effects on the communication efficiency in the wireless networks. Recently proposed protocols such as Freeze-TCP, TCP-Probing, TCP Westwood/Westwood+, TCP Veno, TCP-Jersey, and JTCP, all imp rove over th e traditional TCP p ro to cols. This paper reports a quantitative comparison of recent protocols against the currently most often used namely, TCP SACK, TCP NewReno, and TCP Vegas. Simulation tests were designed for various network layouts, and with differing external interferences in an attempt to most accurately simulate real-life scenarios. To carry out these comparisons, the performance of each protocol was measured based on three benchmark metrics: throughput, average congestion window, and time to complete a file transfer.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Traditional TCP protocols treat all packet loss as a sign of congestion. Their inability to recognize non-congestion related packet loss has significant effects on the communication efficiency in the wireless networks. Recently proposed protocols such as Freeze-TCP, TCP-Probing, TCP Westwood/Westwood+, TCP Veno, TCP-Jersey, and JTCP, all imp rove over th e traditional TCP p ro to cols. This paper reports a quantitative comparison of recent protocols against the currently most often used namely, TCP SACK, TCP NewReno, and TCP Vegas. Simulation tests were designed for various network layouts, and with differing external interferences in an attempt to most accurately simulate real-life scenarios. To carry out these comparisons, the performance of each protocol was measured based on three benchmark metrics: throughput, average congestion window, and time to complete a file transfer.

Key concepts: TCP Vegas, TCP global synchronization, Zeta-TCP, Computer science, TCP Westwood, Compound TCP, TCP Westwood plus, TCP acceleration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficiency Study of TCP Protocols in InfrastructuredWireless Networks — Research Paper | ScholarLens