1996SMPTE JournalOpen access

Searching for the Perfect Aspect Ratio

Mark Schubin

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

A debate is currently taking place over the appropriate aspect ratio for advanced television displays. Any selected aspect ratio is inherently incompatible with any other and will require the use of some form of accommodation technique. The derivation of the 16:9 (1.78:1) aspect ratio from accommodation techniques and display modes is explained, as is the relationship between aspect ratio and display memory. Research into the history of aspect ratios indicates that the 1.78:1 aspect ratio was adopted by the Standards Committee of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (SMPE) in 1930. It also indicates that the factors that may initially have led to widescreen motion picture systems may no longer be applicable. The research for this paper found no clear indication of a preference for any particular aspect ratio for moving images nor any physiological reason to favor one over another. The research did show that cinematographers have not always favored the same aspect ratio.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A debate is currently taking place over the appropriate aspect ratio for advanced television displays. Any selected aspect ratio is inherently incompatible with any other and will require the use of some form of accommodation technique. The derivation of the 16:9 (1.78:1) aspect ratio from accommodation techniques and display modes is explained, as is the relationship between aspect ratio and display memory. Research into the history of aspect ratios indicates that the 1.78:1 aspect ratio was adopted by the Standards Committee of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (SMPE) in 1930. It also indicates that the factors that may initially have led to widescreen motion picture systems may no longer be applicable. The research for this paper found no clear indication of a preference for any particular aspect ratio for moving images nor any physiological reason to favor one over another. The research did show that cinematographers have not always favored the same aspect ratio.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A debate is currently taking place over the appropriate aspect ratio for advanced television displays. Any selected aspect ratio is inherently incompatible with any other and will require the use of some form of accommodation technique. The derivation of the 16:9 (1.78:1) aspect ratio from accommodation techniques and display modes is explained, as is the relationship between aspect ratio and display memory. Research into the history of aspect ratios indicates that the 1.78:1 aspect ratio was adopted by the Standards Committee of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (SMPE) in 1930. It also indicates that the factors that may initially have led to widescreen motion picture systems may no longer be applicable. The research for this paper found no clear indication of a preference for any particular aspect ratio for moving images nor any physiological reason to favor one over another. The research did show that cinematographers have not always favored the same aspect ratio.

Key concepts: Aspect ratio (aeronautics), Accommodation, Contrast ratio, Motion (physics), Aspect-oriented programming, Preference, Computer science, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Searching for the Perfect Aspect Ratio — Research Paper | ScholarLens