(10) Concluding comments
Paul Bissell, Janine Morgall Traulsen
Abstract
Paul Bissell, Janine Morgall Traulsen
Abstract
Abstract In this concluding article, we draw out some general points from the preceding articles in the series. We also seek to provide a rationale for why we think pharmacy practice researchers should engage with theory, drawing on our experience as researchers in the field. The subject of non-compliance is used as an example to illustrate how the different sociological theories discussed in the series might inform research questions in pharmacy practice research.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract In this concluding article, we draw out some general points from the preceding articles in the series. We also seek to provide a rationale for why we think pharmacy practice researchers should engage with theory, drawing on our experience as researchers in the field. The subject of non-compliance is used as an example to illustrate how the different sociological theories discussed in the series might inform research questions in pharmacy practice research.
Key concepts: Subject (documents), Medicine, Pharmacy, Field (mathematics), Engineering ethics, Epistemology, Nursing, Library science