2015The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)Open access

Escalating levels of glyphosate resistance in Iowa populations of Conyza canadensis (horseweed): implications for fitness effects

Emily Ernst

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Glyphosate, sold as RoundUp, is the most commonly used herbicide worldwide and more than 30 weed species have evolved resistance to it. In Conyza canadensis (horseweed or marestail), glyphosate resistance was first reported in 2000 in Delaware, while Iowa has only seen resistance since 2011. The goals of this experiment were to 1) test for habitat differences in the level of glyphosate resistance, and 2) test for differences in fitness traits (rosette size and biomass) between susceptible and resistant biotypes in Iowa. I hypothesized that greater levels of glyphosate resistance would be found in agricultural populations than non-agricultural, and that resistance would not be associated with slower growth. Seeds were collected from 28 populations in 2013, with one maternal line (biotype) per population, representing 14 biotypes from soybean fields and 14 biotypes from non-agricultural habitats (e.g., roadsides, parks, etc.). Seedlings were grown in a greenhouse and sprayed with glyphosate after six weeks using three dosages: 1X (= 0.84 kg ae glyphosate/ha), 8X, and 20X, with 0X as a control. With 24 plants in each dosage treatment, per cohort, biotypes with at least 80% survival at each dosage were designated as “resistant” (1X), “highly resistant” (8X), or “extremely resistant” (20X), respectively. I found that 93% of non-agricultural biotypes and one agricultural biotype were susceptible at 1X. Also, 36% of agricultural biotypes were extremely resistant compared to none from non-agricultural habitats, confirming my first hypothesis. Differences in rosette size between susceptible vs. resistant biotypes were significant (p < 0.0001), resulting in larger resistant plants, and differences in biomass were not significant. My results suggest that glyphosate resistance is likely to persist and may increase in frequency and strength if selection pressures from glyphosate applications continue and if seeds of resistant biotypes disperse into non-agricultural areas. Worldwide, the spread of glyphosate-resistant weeds is causing growers to use herbicide mixtures that include other modes of action.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Glyphosate, sold as RoundUp, is the most commonly used herbicide worldwide and more than 30 weed species have evolved resistance to it. In Conyza canadensis (horseweed or marestail), glyphosate resistance was first reported in 2000 in Delaware, while Iowa has only seen resistance since 2011. The goals of this experiment were to 1) test for habitat differences in the level of glyphosate resistance, and 2) test for differences in fitness traits (rosette size and biomass) between susceptible and resistant biotypes in Iowa. I hypothesized that greater levels of glyphosate resistance would be found in agricultural populations than non-agricultural, and that resistance would not be associated with slower growth. Seeds were collected from 28 populations in 2013, with one maternal line (biotype) per population, representing 14 biotypes from soybean fields and 14 biotypes from non-agricultural habitats (e.g., roadsides, parks, etc.). Seedlings were grown in a greenhouse and sprayed with glyphosate after six weeks using three dosages: 1X (= 0.84 kg ae glyphosate/ha), 8X, and 20X, with 0X as a control. With 24 plants in each dosage treatment, per cohort, biotypes with at least 80% survival at each dosage were designated as “resistant” (1X), “highly resistant” (8X), or “extremely resistant” (20X), respectively. I found that 93% of non-agricultural biotypes and one agricultural biotype were susceptible at 1X. Also, 36% of agricultural biotypes were extremely resistant compared to none from non-agricultural habitats, confirming my first hypothesis. Differences in rosette size between susceptible vs. resistant biotypes were significant (p < 0.0001), resulting in larger resistant plants, and differences in biomass were not significant. My results suggest that glyphosate resistance is likely to persist and may increase in frequency and strength if selection pressures from glyphosate applications continue and if seeds of resistant biotypes disperse into non-agricultural areas. Worldwide, the spread of glyphosate-resistant weeds is causing growers to use herbicide mixtures that include other modes of action.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Glyphosate, sold as RoundUp, is the most commonly used herbicide worldwide and more than 30 weed species have evolved resistance to it. In Conyza canadensis (horseweed or marestail), glyphosate resistance was first reported in 2000 in Delaware, while Iowa has only seen resistance since 2011. The goals of this experiment were to 1) test for habitat differences in the level of glyphosate resistance, and 2) test for differences in fitness traits (rosette size and biomass) between susceptible and resistant biotypes in Iowa. I hypothesized that greater levels of glyphosate resistance would be found in agricultural populations than non-agricultural, and that resistance would not be associated with slower growth. Seeds were collected from 28 populations in 2013, with one maternal line (biotype) per population, representing 14 biotypes from soybean fields and 14 biotypes from non-agricultural habitats (e.g., roadsides, parks, etc.). Seedlings were grown in a greenhouse and sprayed with glyphosate after six weeks using three dosages: 1X (= 0.84 kg ae glyphosate/ha), 8X, and 20X, with 0X as a control. With 24 plants in each dosage treatment, per cohort, biotypes with at least 80% survival at each dosage were designated as “resistant” (1X), “highly resistant” (8X), or “extremely resistant” (20X), respectively. I found that 93% of non-agricultural biotypes and one agricultural biotype were susceptible at 1X. Also, 36% of agricultural biotypes were extremely resistant compared to none from non-agricultural habitats, confirming my first hypothesis. Differences in rosette size between susceptible vs. resistant biotypes were significant (p < 0.0001), resulting in larger resistant plants, and differences in biomass were not significant. My results suggest that glyphosate resistance is likely to persist and may increase in frequency and strength if selection pressures from glyphosate applications continue and if seeds of resistant biotypes disperse into non-agricultural areas. Worldwide, the spread of glyphosate-resistant weeds is causing growers to use herbicide mixtures that include other modes of action.

Key concepts: Glyphosate, Herbicide resistance, Biology, Resistance (ecology), Agronomy, Weed control

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Escalating levels of glyphosate resistance in Iowa populations of Conyza canadensis (horseweed): implications for fitness effects — Research Paper | ScholarLens