2009Unpublished venueRequires access

Innovation Licensing Schemes under Asymmetric Information on Technology Quality

Qingyou Yan, Lili Zhu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

An innovation licensor's problem of contracting when the licensor and a potential licensee engage in Cournot competition is studied in this paper. The licensor has a technology innovation that allows reduction of production costs, the magnitude of which is the private information of the licensor. The mode of licensing considered is the general two-part tariff licensing. It is shown that from the perspective of the patent-holding firm, the optimal licensing schemes depend on the actual magnitude of the innovation and the license's prior belief toward the innovation's technology quality. Specifically, for a small innovation, and the licensee believes the magnitude of the innovation is small too, the optimal licensing mode is by pooling contract. For a small innovation, but the licensee believes the magnitude of the innovation is high, the optimal licensing mode is under separating contracts. For the case of a large innovation, the optimal licensing mode is against pooling contract. However, irrespectively of the licensing contracts to offer, licensing by means of a fee and a royalty is superior to using either alone.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An innovation licensor's problem of contracting when the licensor and a potential licensee engage in Cournot competition is studied in this paper. The licensor has a technology innovation that allows reduction of production costs, the magnitude of which is the private information of the licensor. The mode of licensing considered is the general two-part tariff licensing. It is shown that from the perspective of the patent-holding firm, the optimal licensing schemes depend on the actual magnitude of the innovation and the license's prior belief toward the innovation's technology quality. Specifically, for a small innovation, and the licensee believes the magnitude of the innovation is small too, the optimal licensing mode is by pooling contract. For a small innovation, but the licensee believes the magnitude of the innovation is high, the optimal licensing mode is under separating contracts. For the case of a large innovation, the optimal licensing mode is against pooling contract. However, irrespectively of the licensing contracts to offer, licensing by means of a fee and a royalty is superior to using either alone.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An innovation licensor's problem of contracting when the licensor and a potential licensee engage in Cournot competition is studied in this paper. The licensor has a technology innovation that allows reduction of production costs, the magnitude of which is the private information of the licensor. The mode of licensing considered is the general two-part tariff licensing. It is shown that from the perspective of the patent-holding firm, the optimal licensing schemes depend on the actual magnitude of the innovation and the license's prior belief toward the innovation's technology quality. Specifically, for a small innovation, and the licensee believes the magnitude of the innovation is small too, the optimal licensing mode is by pooling contract. For a small innovation, but the licensee believes the magnitude of the innovation is high, the optimal licensing mode is under separating contracts. For the case of a large innovation, the optimal licensing mode is against pooling contract. However, irrespectively of the licensing contracts to offer, licensing by means of a fee and a royalty is superior to using either alone.

Key concepts: Licensee, License, Pooling, Business, Industrial organization, Quality (philosophy), Competition (biology), Mode (computer interface)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Innovation Licensing Schemes under Asymmetric Information on Technology Quality — Research Paper | ScholarLens