1992•Journal of Geotechnical EngineeringRequires access

Field Performance and Analysis of Steep Riprap

Guy Lefebvre, Karol Rohan, Mahrez Ben Belfadhel, Oscar Dascal

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

The performance of riprap with a slope on the order of 1.5:1 to 2.3:1 was evaluated at 14 different dam sites in the James Bay Territory in Northern Québec. The field investigations included gradation measurement at each site and have allowed a back analysis of the performance using the wave height experienced by the riprap since reservoir filling. The wave prediction method recommended by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in 1984 and the Hudson stability formula have allowed a back analysis in good agreement with the observed field performance for regular gradation riprap. For riprap containing a significant portion of fine material, the observed damage was always more severe than predicted using the median weight. The results of the study show that for steep slopes the inclusion of fine stones in the riprap is detrimental to the stability.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The performance of riprap with a slope on the order of 1.5:1 to 2.3:1 was evaluated at 14 different dam sites in the James Bay Territory in Northern Québec. The field investigations included gradation measurement at each site and have allowed a back analysis of the performance using the wave height experienced by the riprap since reservoir filling. The wave prediction method recommended by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in 1984 and the Hudson stability formula have allowed a back analysis in good agreement with the observed field performance for regular gradation riprap. For riprap containing a significant portion of fine material, the observed damage was always more severe than predicted using the median weight. The results of the study show that for steep slopes the inclusion of fine stones in the riprap is detrimental to the stability.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The performance of riprap with a slope on the order of 1.5:1 to 2.3:1 was evaluated at 14 different dam sites in the James Bay Territory in Northern Québec. The field investigations included gradation measurement at each site and have allowed a back analysis of the performance using the wave height experienced by the riprap since reservoir filling. The wave prediction method recommended by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in 1984 and the Hudson stability formula have allowed a back analysis in good agreement with the observed field performance for regular gradation riprap. For riprap containing a significant portion of fine material, the observed damage was always more severe than predicted using the median weight. The results of the study show that for steep slopes the inclusion of fine stones in the riprap is detrimental to the stability.

Key concepts: Riprap, Gradation, Geotechnical engineering, Geology, Cobble, Habitat, Computer science, Ecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Field Performance and Analysis of Steep Riprap — Research Paper | ScholarLens