2004Journal of Mass SpectrometryRequires access

Matrix‐free infrared soft laser desorption/ionization

David J. Rousell, Sucharita Dutta, Mark W. Little, Kermit K. Murray

Open publisher page 37 citations

Abstract

Abstract Infrared soft laser desorption/ionization was performed using a 2.94 µm Er : YAG laser and a commercial reflectron time‐of‐flight mass spectrometer. The instrument was modified so that a 337 nm nitrogen laser could be used concurrently with the IR laser to interrogate samples. Matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI), laser desorption/ionization and desorption/ionization on silicon with UV and IR lasers were compared. Various target materials were tested for IR soft desorption ionization, including stainless steel, aluminum, copper, silicon, porous silicon and polyethylene. Silicon surfaces gave the best performance in terms of signal level and low‐mass interference. The internal energy resultant of the desorption/ionization was assessed using the easily fragmented vitamin B12 molecule. IR ionization produced more analyte fragmentation than UV‐MALDI analysis. Fragmentation from matrix‐free IR desorption from silicon was comparable to that from IR‐MALDI. The results are interpreted as soft laser desorption and ionization resulting from the absorption of the IR laser energy by the analyte and associated solvent molecules. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Infrared soft laser desorption/ionization was performed using a 2.94 µm Er : YAG laser and a commercial reflectron time‐of‐flight mass spectrometer. The instrument was modified so that a 337 nm nitrogen laser could be used concurrently with the IR laser to interrogate samples. Matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI), laser desorption/ionization and desorption/ionization on silicon with UV and IR lasers were compared. Various target materials were tested for IR soft desorption ionization, including stainless steel, aluminum, copper, silicon, porous silicon and polyethylene. Silicon surfaces gave the best performance in terms of signal level and low‐mass interference. The internal energy resultant of the desorption/ionization was assessed using the easily fragmented vitamin B12 molecule. IR ionization produced more analyte fragmentation than UV‐MALDI analysis. Fragmentation from matrix‐free IR desorption from silicon was comparable to that from IR‐MALDI. The results are interpreted as soft laser desorption and ionization resulting from the absorption of the IR laser energy by the analyte and associated solvent molecules. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 37 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Infrared soft laser desorption/ionization was performed using a 2.94 µm Er : YAG laser and a commercial reflectron time‐of‐flight mass spectrometer. The instrument was modified so that a 337 nm nitrogen laser could be used concurrently with the IR laser to interrogate samples. Matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI), laser desorption/ionization and desorption/ionization on silicon with UV and IR lasers were compared. Various target materials were tested for IR soft desorption ionization, including stainless steel, aluminum, copper, silicon, porous silicon and polyethylene. Silicon surfaces gave the best performance in terms of signal level and low‐mass interference. The internal energy resultant of the desorption/ionization was assessed using the easily fragmented vitamin B12 molecule. IR ionization produced more analyte fragmentation than UV‐MALDI analysis. Fragmentation from matrix‐free IR desorption from silicon was comparable to that from IR‐MALDI. The results are interpreted as soft laser desorption and ionization resulting from the absorption of the IR laser energy by the analyte and associated solvent molecules. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Key concepts: Soft laser desorption, Matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization, Chemistry, Atmospheric-pressure laser ionization, Desorption, Mass spectrometry, Ionization, Analytical Chemistry (journal)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Matrix‐free infrared soft laser desorption/ionization — Research Paper | ScholarLens