2015Unpublished venueOpen access

A reflection on agile requirements engineering

Irum Inayat, Lauriane Moraes, Maya Daneva, Siti Salwah Salim

Open full text 20 citations

Abstract

The software development industry has rapidly accepted agile methods. Empirical studies suggest that due to their flexible and emergent nature, agile methods brought solutions to several chronic problems of traditional software development methods. One among the many is the acceptance of requirements changes at later stages of development. However, knowledge about the solutions that agile brought to requirements engineering (RE) is fragmented. Also, little is known about whether the agile philosophy, while introducing solutions to well-known RE problems from the past, has unintentionally opened new challenges. This paper offers a reflection on this matter. Based on the results of our recently published systematic review on agile RE, we reflect on the differences of 'traditional' and agile RE and the practices adopted by the latter, on the solutions and challenges of agile RE, and on some implications that agile RE might have posed for research and practice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The software development industry has rapidly accepted agile methods. Empirical studies suggest that due to their flexible and emergent nature, agile methods brought solutions to several chronic problems of traditional software development methods. One among the many is the acceptance of requirements changes at later stages of development. However, knowledge about the solutions that agile brought to requirements engineering (RE) is fragmented. Also, little is known about whether the agile philosophy, while introducing solutions to well-known RE problems from the past, has unintentionally opened new challenges. This paper offers a reflection on this matter. Based on the results of our recently published systematic review on agile RE, we reflect on the differences of 'traditional' and agile RE and the practices adopted by the latter, on the solutions and challenges of agile RE, and on some implications that agile RE might have posed for research and practice.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The software development industry has rapidly accepted agile methods. Empirical studies suggest that due to their flexible and emergent nature, agile methods brought solutions to several chronic problems of traditional software development methods. One among the many is the acceptance of requirements changes at later stages of development. However, knowledge about the solutions that agile brought to requirements engineering (RE) is fragmented. Also, little is known about whether the agile philosophy, while introducing solutions to well-known RE problems from the past, has unintentionally opened new challenges. This paper offers a reflection on this matter. Based on the results of our recently published systematic review on agile RE, we reflect on the differences of 'traditional' and agile RE and the practices adopted by the latter, on the solutions and challenges of agile RE, and on some implications that agile RE might have posed for research and practice.

Key concepts: Agile software development, Agile Unified Process, Agile usability engineering, Requirement, Extreme programming practices, Lean software development, Reflection (computer programming), Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A reflection on agile requirements engineering — Research Paper | ScholarLens