2008Soil Science Society of America JournalRequires access

A New Approach to Estimate Soil Hydraulic Parameters Using Only Soil Water Retention Data

Navin K. C. Twarakavi, Hirotaka Saito, Jiřı́ Šimůnek, Martinus Th. van Genuchten

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

Traditional approaches for estimating soil hydraulic parameters (such as the RETC code) perform well when experimental data for both the retention curve and hydraulic conductivity function are available; however, unsaturated hydraulic conductivity data are often unavailable. The objective of this work was to develop an approach to estimate robust soil hydraulic parameters from water retention curve data alone. The proposed approach, called the Multiobjective Retention Curve Estimator (MORE), is based on the Multiobjective Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis (MOSCEM‐UA) algorithm and estimates an optimal parameter set by simultaneously minimizing two objective functions each representing water content and relative unsaturated hydraulic conductivity residuals. To address the lack of observed unsaturated hydraulic conductivity data, MORE transforms both predicted and observed water contents into the hydraulic conductivity space using a pore‐size distribution model (e.g., the Mualem model) and also optimizes the soil hydraulic parameters in this fictitious space. We applied MORE to two cases. In the first case, MORE was used to estimate soil parameters using only retention curve data for 12 random soils selected from the UNSODA database. While the soil hydraulic parameters estimated using RETC and MORE fit the retention curve similarly, the MORE approach consistently decreased the error in fitting unsaturated hydraulic conductivities by as much as 5% compared with RETC. The second case involved using the parameters fitted using the MORE and RETC approaches to model a field‐scale experiment. Compared with RETC, the error in predicted water contents decreased by 25% using parameters predicted by MORE. The MORE approach was shown to fit robust soil hydraulic parameters; however, the approach is relatively slower and more time consuming than RETC.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Traditional approaches for estimating soil hydraulic parameters (such as the RETC code) perform well when experimental data for both the retention curve and hydraulic conductivity function are available; however, unsaturated hydraulic conductivity data are often unavailable. The objective of this work was to develop an approach to estimate robust soil hydraulic parameters from water retention curve data alone. The proposed approach, called the Multiobjective Retention Curve Estimator (MORE), is based on the Multiobjective Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis (MOSCEM‐UA) algorithm and estimates an optimal parameter set by simultaneously minimizing two objective functions each representing water content and relative unsaturated hydraulic conductivity residuals. To address the lack of observed unsaturated hydraulic conductivity data, MORE transforms both predicted and observed water contents into the hydraulic conductivity space using a pore‐size distribution model (e.g., the Mualem model) and also optimizes the soil hydraulic parameters in this fictitious space. We applied MORE to two cases. In the first case, MORE was used to estimate soil parameters using only retention curve data for 12 random soils selected from the UNSODA database. While the soil hydraulic parameters estimated using RETC and MORE fit the retention curve similarly, the MORE approach consistently decreased the error in fitting unsaturated hydraulic conductivities by as much as 5% compared with RETC. The second case involved using the parameters fitted using the MORE and RETC approaches to model a field‐scale experiment. Compared with RETC, the error in predicted water contents decreased by 25% using parameters predicted by MORE. The MORE approach was shown to fit robust soil hydraulic parameters; however, the approach is relatively slower and more time consuming than RETC.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Traditional approaches for estimating soil hydraulic parameters (such as the RETC code) perform well when experimental data for both the retention curve and hydraulic conductivity function are available; however, unsaturated hydraulic conductivity data are often unavailable. The objective of this work was to develop an approach to estimate robust soil hydraulic parameters from water retention curve data alone. The proposed approach, called the Multiobjective Retention Curve Estimator (MORE), is based on the Multiobjective Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis (MOSCEM‐UA) algorithm and estimates an optimal parameter set by simultaneously minimizing two objective functions each representing water content and relative unsaturated hydraulic conductivity residuals. To address the lack of observed unsaturated hydraulic conductivity data, MORE transforms both predicted and observed water contents into the hydraulic conductivity space using a pore‐size distribution model (e.g., the Mualem model) and also optimizes the soil hydraulic parameters in this fictitious space. We applied MORE to two cases. In the first case, MORE was used to estimate soil parameters using only retention curve data for 12 random soils selected from the UNSODA database. While the soil hydraulic parameters estimated using RETC and MORE fit the retention curve similarly, the MORE approach consistently decreased the error in fitting unsaturated hydraulic conductivities by as much as 5% compared with RETC. The second case involved using the parameters fitted using the MORE and RETC approaches to model a field‐scale experiment. Compared with RETC, the error in predicted water contents decreased by 25% using parameters predicted by MORE. The MORE approach was shown to fit robust soil hydraulic parameters; however, the approach is relatively slower and more time consuming than RETC.

Key concepts: Hydraulic conductivity, Water retention, Water retention curve, Soil water, Pedotransfer function, Soil science, Estimator, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A New Approach to Estimate Soil Hydraulic Parameters Using Only Soil Water Retention Data — Research Paper | ScholarLens