Traffic grooming in light trail networks
Yabin Ye, Hagen Woesner, Raffaele Grasso, Tao Chen, Imrich Chlamtac
Abstract
Yabin Ye, Hagen Woesner, Raffaele Grasso, Tao Chen, Imrich Chlamtac
Abstract
In today's WDM networks the dominating cost factor is the number of transceivers. Light trails have been shown to reduce the total number of wavelengths, however not necessarily the number of transceivers used in the network. Within this paper we explain two mechanisms that deal with reducing the total number of transceivers in light trail networks. While the first method - 'tune in' light trails (TILT) - ensures that this number is at most the one of a corresponding lightpath network, traffic grooming can be applied in light trail networks as well to reduce the number of transceivers even further. Simulation results show that the TILT network has much better performance than the traditional counterpart, especially when the number of transceivers in the network is limited. Also the light trail network with grooming has better performance than that without grooming
OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In today's WDM networks the dominating cost factor is the number of transceivers. Light trails have been shown to reduce the total number of wavelengths, however not necessarily the number of transceivers used in the network. Within this paper we explain two mechanisms that deal with reducing the total number of transceivers in light trail networks. While the first method - 'tune in' light trails (TILT) - ensures that this number is at most the one of a corresponding lightpath network, traffic grooming can be applied in light trail networks as well to reduce the number of transceivers even further. Simulation results show that the TILT network has much better performance than the traditional counterpart, especially when the number of transceivers in the network is limited. Also the light trail network with grooming has better performance than that without grooming
Key concepts: Transceiver, Traffic grooming, Computer network, Computer science, Tilt (camera), Wavelength-division multiplexing, Visible light communication, Topology (electrical circuits)