2005GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005.Requires access

Traffic grooming in light trail networks

Yabin Ye, Hagen Woesner, Raffaele Grasso, Tao Chen, Imrich Chlamtac

Open publisher page 33 citations

Abstract

In today's WDM networks the dominating cost factor is the number of transceivers. Light trails have been shown to reduce the total number of wavelengths, however not necessarily the number of transceivers used in the network. Within this paper we explain two mechanisms that deal with reducing the total number of transceivers in light trail networks. While the first method - 'tune in' light trails (TILT) - ensures that this number is at most the one of a corresponding lightpath network, traffic grooming can be applied in light trail networks as well to reduce the number of transceivers even further. Simulation results show that the TILT network has much better performance than the traditional counterpart, especially when the number of transceivers in the network is limited. Also the light trail network with grooming has better performance than that without grooming

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In today's WDM networks the dominating cost factor is the number of transceivers. Light trails have been shown to reduce the total number of wavelengths, however not necessarily the number of transceivers used in the network. Within this paper we explain two mechanisms that deal with reducing the total number of transceivers in light trail networks. While the first method - 'tune in' light trails (TILT) - ensures that this number is at most the one of a corresponding lightpath network, traffic grooming can be applied in light trail networks as well to reduce the number of transceivers even further. Simulation results show that the TILT network has much better performance than the traditional counterpart, especially when the number of transceivers in the network is limited. Also the light trail network with grooming has better performance than that without grooming

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In today's WDM networks the dominating cost factor is the number of transceivers. Light trails have been shown to reduce the total number of wavelengths, however not necessarily the number of transceivers used in the network. Within this paper we explain two mechanisms that deal with reducing the total number of transceivers in light trail networks. While the first method - 'tune in' light trails (TILT) - ensures that this number is at most the one of a corresponding lightpath network, traffic grooming can be applied in light trail networks as well to reduce the number of transceivers even further. Simulation results show that the TILT network has much better performance than the traditional counterpart, especially when the number of transceivers in the network is limited. Also the light trail network with grooming has better performance than that without grooming

Key concepts: Transceiver, Traffic grooming, Computer network, Computer science, Tilt (camera), Wavelength-division multiplexing, Visible light communication, Topology (electrical circuits)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Traffic grooming in light trail networks — Research Paper | ScholarLens