The Use of Secondary Reinforcement in Teaching Inner-City School Children
Carl A. Clark, Herbert J. Walberg
Abstract
Carl A. Clark, Herbert J. Walberg
Abstract
For a number of years we have been experimenting with the effects of re-wards on classroom learning. We have found the classroom to be a satisfactory laboratory, particularly with slow-learning and mentally re-tarded pupils. It is our belief that when there is greater recognition that the classroom can be an excellent place for experimentation, and when rigor-ous experimental conditions are per-mitted and encouraged, the progress of psychological research and educa-tional practice will be accelerated, and there will be less reliance on pedagogical philosophies and meth-ods which are subjectively based upon authority or fad. A number of studies will be re-ported here which illustrate the thesis that the classroom can serve as an educational laboratory. These studies concern the school achievement of retarded and culturally-deprived stu-dents.’ Study 1: Competition as motivation Harris (1958) carried out one of our first experiments in the controlled use of secondary reinforcement in class-room learning. The independent vari-able was the learning of spelling. The motivation was competition, certainly one of the most important of learned human drives. The children in the ex-periment had been classified as &dquo;mentally handicapped.&dquo; The motiva-tion of competition has not often been used with such children in academic 1 Dr. Concetta V. Romanow participated in guid-ing Studies 1, 2, and 3, which were conducted by
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
For a number of years we have been experimenting with the effects of re-wards on classroom learning. We have found the classroom to be a satisfactory laboratory, particularly with slow-learning and mentally re-tarded pupils. It is our belief that when there is greater recognition that the classroom can be an excellent place for experimentation, and when rigor-ous experimental conditions are per-mitted and encouraged, the progress of psychological research and educa-tional practice will be accelerated, and there will be less reliance on pedagogical philosophies and meth-ods which are subjectively based upon authority or fad. A number of studies will be re-ported here which illustrate the thesis that the classroom can serve as an educational laboratory. These studies concern the school achievement of retarded and culturally-deprived stu-dents.’ Study 1: Competition as motivation Harris (1958) carried out one of our first experiments in the controlled use of secondary reinforcement in class-room learning. The independent vari-able was the learning of spelling. The motivation was competition, certainly one of the most important of learned human drives. The children in the ex-periment had been classified as &dquo;mentally handicapped.&dquo; The motiva-tion of competition has not often been used with such children in academic 1 Dr. Concetta V. Romanow participated in guid-ing Studies 1, 2, and 3, which were conducted by
Key concepts: Inner city, Reinforcement, Psychology, Mathematics education, Pedagogy, Developmental psychology, Social psychology, Sociology