Comparison of nifedipine and progesterone for maintenance tocolysis after arrested preterm labour

The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of nifedipine and progesterone for maintenance tocolysis after arrested preterm labour, in prolonging pregnancy and preventing recurrence of preterm labour. This study was a randomised comparative study conducted on 110 pregnant women with arrested preterm labour, randomised to receive either nifedipine 20 mg Q 8-hourly or progesterone 400 mg daily for maintenance tocolysis. Other than demographic parameters, obstetric parameters like previous history of abortions or preterm deliveries, gestational age, cervical dilatation and effacement, ultrasound measured cervical length at admission, were noted. Outcome measures studied were mean prolongation of pregnancy, mode of delivery, neonatal outcome and side-effects of both the drugs. We found that there was no significant difference in the demographic profile, parity, number of abortions, previous preterm deliveries, gestational age, cervical dilatation and effacement at admission between the two groups. A total of 10% of the patients in the nifedipine group and 61% of the patients in the progesterone group delivered at term (p value 0.000). The mean prolongation of pregnancy in the nifedipine group was 16.63 days and 40.14 days in the progesterone group which was significant (p = 0.000). Neonates in the progesterone group had better birth weight, better Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, lesser need for ventilation and significantly lesser composite morbidity. Nifedipine was associated significantly with side-effects. We conclude that when compared with nifedipine, progesterone significantly prolongs pregnancy in women with arrested preterm labour with better neonatal outcomes and fewer side-effects.