1986•Biodemography and Social BiologyRequires access

Another look at the Hutterites and natural rertility

Warren C. Robinson

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

The fertility of the Hutterites has become almost legendary in the demographic literature. Coale selected their overall total fertility rate (equal to 10.9) as the standard for his index of marital fertility (Coale, 1965). The rate is very commonly used as a benchmark for “natural fertility” that is, as an indicator of how high human procreation can be under favorable environmental conditions and with no deliberate controls. The present note takes off from the interesting but unexplored fact that while the Hutterite TFR of 10.9 is high relative to most other extant populations, this rate does not, in fact, represent a maximum biological potential TFR. In other words, some controls do seem to be at work even among the Hutterites. The purpose of this exercise is two‐fold: (1) We estimate a modified figure for what Hutterite fertility could be under a truly unconstrained regime and present a revised age pattern of that fertility; (2) We compare this modified Hutterite age‐specific fertility‐rate pattern to the “natural fertility” age‐specific fertility‐rate pattern and look at some broader implications.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The fertility of the Hutterites has become almost legendary in the demographic literature. Coale selected their overall total fertility rate (equal to 10.9) as the standard for his index of marital fertility (Coale, 1965). The rate is very commonly used as a benchmark for “natural fertility” that is, as an indicator of how high human procreation can be under favorable environmental conditions and with no deliberate controls. The present note takes off from the interesting but unexplored fact that while the Hutterite TFR of 10.9 is high relative to most other extant populations, this rate does not, in fact, represent a maximum biological potential TFR. In other words, some controls do seem to be at work even among the Hutterites. The purpose of this exercise is two‐fold: (1) We estimate a modified figure for what Hutterite fertility could be under a truly unconstrained regime and present a revised age pattern of that fertility; (2) We compare this modified Hutterite age‐specific fertility‐rate pattern to the “natural fertility” age‐specific fertility‐rate pattern and look at some broader implications.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The fertility of the Hutterites has become almost legendary in the demographic literature. Coale selected their overall total fertility rate (equal to 10.9) as the standard for his index of marital fertility (Coale, 1965). The rate is very commonly used as a benchmark for “natural fertility” that is, as an indicator of how high human procreation can be under favorable environmental conditions and with no deliberate controls. The present note takes off from the interesting but unexplored fact that while the Hutterite TFR of 10.9 is high relative to most other extant populations, this rate does not, in fact, represent a maximum biological potential TFR. In other words, some controls do seem to be at work even among the Hutterites. The purpose of this exercise is two‐fold: (1) We estimate a modified figure for what Hutterite fertility could be under a truly unconstrained regime and present a revised age pattern of that fertility; (2) We compare this modified Hutterite age‐specific fertility‐rate pattern to the “natural fertility” age‐specific fertility‐rate pattern and look at some broader implications.

Key concepts: Fertility, Natural fertility, Total fertility rate, Demography, Extant taxon, Birth rate, Biology, Geography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Another look at the Hutterites and natural rertility — Research Paper | ScholarLens