Retrieval‐induced forgetting in eyewitness memory: forgetting as a consequence of remembering
M.D. Macleod
Abstract
M.D. Macleod
Abstract
Abstract Recent psychological research on memory has demonstrated that the act of remembering can also prompt forgetting, or more specifically, the inhibition of particular items in memory (i.e. retrieval‐induced forgetting). Extending this line of inquiry, this article reports the findings from two studies designed to establish whether retrieval‐induced forgetting can occur for meaningful stimuli that could be experienced under eyewitness situations. In Study 1, participants were asked to recall previously presented household items that had ostensibly been stolen in burglaries, while in Study 2, participants were asked to recall descriptive details about two individuals suspected of making bogus money collections. Both studies provided unequivocal evidence that retrieval‐induced forgetting can occur for such meaningful stimuli. Importantly, in each case it was demonstrated that the observed effects could not be attributed to output interference. This article considers the likely extent of the problem posed by retrieval‐induced forgetting for eyewitness reliability and some of the practical and theoretical implications of this work. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
OpenAlex reports 127 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Recent psychological research on memory has demonstrated that the act of remembering can also prompt forgetting, or more specifically, the inhibition of particular items in memory (i.e. retrieval‐induced forgetting). Extending this line of inquiry, this article reports the findings from two studies designed to establish whether retrieval‐induced forgetting can occur for meaningful stimuli that could be experienced under eyewitness situations. In Study 1, participants were asked to recall previously presented household items that had ostensibly been stolen in burglaries, while in Study 2, participants were asked to recall descriptive details about two individuals suspected of making bogus money collections. Both studies provided unequivocal evidence that retrieval‐induced forgetting can occur for such meaningful stimuli. Importantly, in each case it was demonstrated that the observed effects could not be attributed to output interference. This article considers the likely extent of the problem posed by retrieval‐induced forgetting for eyewitness reliability and some of the practical and theoretical implications of this work. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Key concepts: Forgetting, Retrieval-induced forgetting, Motivated forgetting, Psychology, Recall, Eyewitness memory, Cognitive psychology, Memory errors