2003ANZ Journal of SurgeryRequires access

Fine‐needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodules: how useful is it?

Joanna L. Morgan, Jonathan W. Serpell, Michael Cheng

Open publisher page 98 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thyroid nodules are common and the principal method of diagnosis is fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). METHODS: To determine the value of FNAC in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules, thyroid cytology of 253 patients with definitive histology after surgery was analyzed from 1992 to 2002. FNAC was correlated with histology and the sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios were calculated. The method of FNAC and number of non-diagnostic aspirates were noted. The frequency of thyroid cancer was investigated in male and females who presented with a solitary thyroid nodule. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of FNAC detecting thyroid neoplasia was 55.0%, specificity 73.7% and accuracy 67.2%. Likelihood ratios indicate that a 'malignant' or 'suspicious for malignancy' cytology dramatically increase the pretest probability of thyroid neoplasia. There were no false positive 'malignant' FNAC. Ultrasound guided FNAC had a significantly lower non-diagnostic rate compared to freehand FNAC (P < 0.02). Of 22 males, 22.7% who proceeded to surgery for their solitary nodule had thyroid carcinoma compared with 11.9% of 167 females (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: FNAC was essential to management in this series of patients. 'Malignant' or 'suspicious for malignancy' cytology are absolute indicators for thyroidectomy. FNAC should be undertaken with ultrasound guidance and if possible with a pathologist in attendance to assess sample adequacy. We recommend a high index of suspicion of thyroid cancer in the male patient who presents with a solitary nodule. If solitary nodules are to be observed, repeat FNAC should be undertaken because of the high false negative rate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Thyroid nodules are common and the principal method of diagnosis is fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). METHODS: To determine the value of FNAC in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules, thyroid cytology of 253 patients with definitive histology after surgery was analyzed from 1992 to 2002. FNAC was correlated with histology and the sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios were calculated. The method of FNAC and number of non-diagnostic aspirates were noted. The frequency of thyroid cancer was investigated in male and females who presented with a solitary thyroid nodule. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of FNAC detecting thyroid neoplasia was 55.0%, specificity 73.7% and accuracy 67.2%. Likelihood ratios indicate that a 'malignant' or 'suspicious for malignancy' cytology dramatically increase the pretest probability of thyroid neoplasia. There were no false positive 'malignant' FNAC. Ultrasound guided FNAC had a significantly lower non-diagnostic rate compared to freehand FNAC (P < 0.02). Of 22 males, 22.7% who proceeded to surgery for their solitary nodule had thyroid carcinoma compared with 11.9% of 167 females (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: FNAC was essential to management in this series of patients. 'Malignant' or 'suspicious for malignancy' cytology are absolute indicators for thyroidectomy. FNAC should be undertaken with ultrasound guidance and if possible with a pathologist in attendance to assess sample adequacy. We recommend a high index of suspicion of thyroid cancer in the male patient who presents with a solitary nodule. If solitary nodules are to be observed, repeat FNAC should be undertaken because of the high false negative rate.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 98 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Thyroid nodules are common and the principal method of diagnosis is fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). METHODS: To determine the value of FNAC in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules, thyroid cytology of 253 patients with definitive histology after surgery was analyzed from 1992 to 2002. FNAC was correlated with histology and the sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios were calculated. The method of FNAC and number of non-diagnostic aspirates were noted. The frequency of thyroid cancer was investigated in male and females who presented with a solitary thyroid nodule. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of FNAC detecting thyroid neoplasia was 55.0%, specificity 73.7% and accuracy 67.2%. Likelihood ratios indicate that a 'malignant' or 'suspicious for malignancy' cytology dramatically increase the pretest probability of thyroid neoplasia. There were no false positive 'malignant' FNAC. Ultrasound guided FNAC had a significantly lower non-diagnostic rate compared to freehand FNAC (P < 0.02). Of 22 males, 22.7% who proceeded to surgery for their solitary nodule had thyroid carcinoma compared with 11.9% of 167 females (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: FNAC was essential to management in this series of patients. 'Malignant' or 'suspicious for malignancy' cytology are absolute indicators for thyroidectomy. FNAC should be undertaken with ultrasound guidance and if possible with a pathologist in attendance to assess sample adequacy. We recommend a high index of suspicion of thyroid cancer in the male patient who presents with a solitary nodule. If solitary nodules are to be observed, repeat FNAC should be undertaken because of the high false negative rate.

Key concepts: Medicine, Thyroid nodules, Thyroid, Radiology, Malignancy, Nodule (geology), Thyroid cancer, Cytology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fine‐needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodules: how useful is it? — Research Paper | ScholarLens