1996Unpublished venueRequires access

IEC 825-1 eye safety classification of some consumer electronic products

Anthony C. Boucouvalas

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

The recently amended IEC 825-1 (and consequently CENELEC EN 60825-1) laser safety classification document, incorporates changes from the previous issue which although improve the maximum allowed emitted LED intensity, it still poses problems to the classification of free space optical link products. The changes from the previous issue are mainly concerned with LEDs, allow approximately 50 times higher output optical power from the previous specification.. We show that in spite of the changes, most of the existing free space optical links cannot be classified as class 1. Calculations are given for class 1 classification, based on Accessible Exposure Limits (AEL), of maximum permissible source intensity in mW/Sr, for typical products available in the M arket.. Under the umbrella of consumer electronics a considerable number of products are now available making use of Infrared (IR) optical links. The most widespread application of this technology within the consumer electronics market is the television remote control unit. As consumers we now expect to control our televisions remotely and for the new generation of consumers-our children it is the ‘norm’. There is hardly a household without remotely controlled televisions. More recently, new “living room entertainment ” products have emerged, hi-fi systems using remote control units, and products such as wireless IR, hi-fi audio phones, allowing us to enjoy our music without disturbing others, and at the same time giving us freedom from trailing wires, Fig.1.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The recently amended IEC 825-1 (and consequently CENELEC EN 60825-1) laser safety classification document, incorporates changes from the previous issue which although improve the maximum allowed emitted LED intensity, it still poses problems to the classification of free space optical link products. The changes from the previous issue are mainly concerned with LEDs, allow approximately 50 times higher output optical power from the previous specification.. We show that in spite of the changes, most of the existing free space optical links cannot be classified as class 1. Calculations are given for class 1 classification, based on Accessible Exposure Limits (AEL), of maximum permissible source intensity in mW/Sr, for typical products available in the M arket.. Under the umbrella of consumer electronics a considerable number of products are now available making use of Infrared (IR) optical links. The most widespread application of this technology within the consumer electronics market is the television remote control unit. As consumers we now expect to control our televisions remotely and for the new generation of consumers-our children it is the ‘norm’. There is hardly a household without remotely controlled televisions. More recently, new “living room entertainment ” products have emerged, hi-fi systems using remote control units, and products such as wireless IR, hi-fi audio phones, allowing us to enjoy our music without disturbing others, and at the same time giving us freedom from trailing wires, Fig.1.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The recently amended IEC 825-1 (and consequently CENELEC EN 60825-1) laser safety classification document, incorporates changes from the previous issue which although improve the maximum allowed emitted LED intensity, it still poses problems to the classification of free space optical link products. The changes from the previous issue are mainly concerned with LEDs, allow approximately 50 times higher output optical power from the previous specification.. We show that in spite of the changes, most of the existing free space optical links cannot be classified as class 1. Calculations are given for class 1 classification, based on Accessible Exposure Limits (AEL), of maximum permissible source intensity in mW/Sr, for typical products available in the M arket.. Under the umbrella of consumer electronics a considerable number of products are now available making use of Infrared (IR) optical links. The most widespread application of this technology within the consumer electronics market is the television remote control unit. As consumers we now expect to control our televisions remotely and for the new generation of consumers-our children it is the ‘norm’. There is hardly a household without remotely controlled televisions. More recently, new “living room entertainment ” products have emerged, hi-fi systems using remote control units, and products such as wireless IR, hi-fi audio phones, allowing us to enjoy our music without disturbing others, and at the same time giving us freedom from trailing wires, Fig.1.

Key concepts: Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
IEC 825-1 eye safety classification of some consumer electronic products — Research Paper | ScholarLens