2008PubMedRequires access

Huge primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma of borderline malignancy mimicking an ovarian mass: case report and review.

Giuseppe Bifulco, Vincenzo Dario Mandato, Pierluigi Giampaolino, Carmine Nappi, Rossella De Cecio, Luigi Insabato, Francisco Tarsitano, Chiara Mignogna

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma is a rare tumor only 48 cases have been reported in international literature. Patients affected by primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma/cystadenocarcinoma ranged in age from 17 to 86 years (median, 42.3 years) and the size of the cystis ranged from 5 to 35 cm (median, 16.1 cm). There is no unanimous opinion on the genesis of these tumors and, due to their extreme rarity, its histogenesis, biological behavior and the optimal management strategy remain at a speculative level. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a huge borderline primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma (24 x 25 cm) in a 35-year-old woman and the strategies adopted for the diagnosis and surgical management. CONCLUSION: Primary mucinous cystic tumor of the retroperitoneum was correctly diagnosed only at the time of surgery. As well as in the majority of cases reported in the literature, preoperative investigations were not able to give information about the tumor site. In spite of the short follow-up (two years), the patient's favorable course supports the hypothesis that primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma may be treated in the same manner as a primary ovarian tumor of the same grade and comparable stage.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma is a rare tumor only 48 cases have been reported in international literature. Patients affected by primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma/cystadenocarcinoma ranged in age from 17 to 86 years (median, 42.3 years) and the size of the cystis ranged from 5 to 35 cm (median, 16.1 cm). There is no unanimous opinion on the genesis of these tumors and, due to their extreme rarity, its histogenesis, biological behavior and the optimal management strategy remain at a speculative level. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a huge borderline primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma (24 x 25 cm) in a 35-year-old woman and the strategies adopted for the diagnosis and surgical management. CONCLUSION: Primary mucinous cystic tumor of the retroperitoneum was correctly diagnosed only at the time of surgery. As well as in the majority of cases reported in the literature, preoperative investigations were not able to give information about the tumor site. In spite of the short follow-up (two years), the patient's favorable course supports the hypothesis that primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma may be treated in the same manner as a primary ovarian tumor of the same grade and comparable stage.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma is a rare tumor only 48 cases have been reported in international literature. Patients affected by primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma/cystadenocarcinoma ranged in age from 17 to 86 years (median, 42.3 years) and the size of the cystis ranged from 5 to 35 cm (median, 16.1 cm). There is no unanimous opinion on the genesis of these tumors and, due to their extreme rarity, its histogenesis, biological behavior and the optimal management strategy remain at a speculative level. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a huge borderline primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma (24 x 25 cm) in a 35-year-old woman and the strategies adopted for the diagnosis and surgical management. CONCLUSION: Primary mucinous cystic tumor of the retroperitoneum was correctly diagnosed only at the time of surgery. As well as in the majority of cases reported in the literature, preoperative investigations were not able to give information about the tumor site. In spite of the short follow-up (two years), the patient's favorable course supports the hypothesis that primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma may be treated in the same manner as a primary ovarian tumor of the same grade and comparable stage.

Key concepts: Mucinous cystadenoma, Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma, Medicine, Cystadenoma, Mucinous Tumor, Cystadenocarcinoma, Retroperitoneal space, Malignancy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Huge primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma of borderline malignancy mimicking an ovarian mass: case report and review. — Research Paper | ScholarLens