Neurobiological Measures of Schizotypal Personality Disorder: Defining an Inhibitory Endophenotype?
Kristin S. Cadenhead, Gregory A. Light, Mark A. Geyer, Jennifer E. McDowell, David Braff
Abstract
Kristin S. Cadenhead, Gregory A. Light, Mark A. Geyer, Jennifer E. McDowell, David Braff
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Subjects with schizotypal personality disorder demonstrate deficits in inhibition when assessed on prepulse inhibition, P50 suppression, and antisaccade paradigms. This study determined if distinct subgroups of subjects with schizotypal personality disorder could be identified on the basis of performance on these measures and whether endophenotypes could be defined for future genetic study by using measures of inhibitory function. METHOD: Prepulse inhibition, P50 suppression, and antisaccade paradigms were assessed in 21 subjects with schizotypal personality disorder. RESULTS: Seven subjects with schizotypal personality disorder had deficits on each paradigm; seven had no deficits on any paradigm. P50 and antisaccade deficits were present in five of the same subjects and significantly correlated. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that P50 and antisaccade performance reflects a common endophenotype and that prepulse inhibition identifies a separate endophenotype reflecting different neurobiological substrate(s) in subjects with schizotypal personality disorder. This pattern may generalize to schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients.
OpenAlex reports 114 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: Subjects with schizotypal personality disorder demonstrate deficits in inhibition when assessed on prepulse inhibition, P50 suppression, and antisaccade paradigms. This study determined if distinct subgroups of subjects with schizotypal personality disorder could be identified on the basis of performance on these measures and whether endophenotypes could be defined for future genetic study by using measures of inhibitory function. METHOD: Prepulse inhibition, P50 suppression, and antisaccade paradigms were assessed in 21 subjects with schizotypal personality disorder. RESULTS: Seven subjects with schizotypal personality disorder had deficits on each paradigm; seven had no deficits on any paradigm. P50 and antisaccade deficits were present in five of the same subjects and significantly correlated. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that P50 and antisaccade performance reflects a common endophenotype and that prepulse inhibition identifies a separate endophenotype reflecting different neurobiological substrate(s) in subjects with schizotypal personality disorder. This pattern may generalize to schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients.
Key concepts: Endophenotype, Prepulse inhibition, Schizotypal personality disorder, Psychology, Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming), Schizotypy, Personality, Schizophrenia spectrum