2004•International Journal of Paediatric DentistryRequires access

Microleakage assessment of pit and fissure sealant with and without the use of pumice prophylaxis

Ghassem Ansari, Kaveh Oloomi, Bita Eslami

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effect of pumice prophylaxis on the level of microleakage around and between the sealant and enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 32 freshly extracted sound upper first premolars, assigned as suitable for sealant application, were chosen and divided randomly into two groups: (1) a test group, without prophylaxis; and (2) a control group, with prophylaxis. Sealant was applied to all teeth using the same conventional technique, with prophylaxis being omitted in the test group. The sealed teeth were thermocycled (120 x 30 s, 5 and 55 degrees C cycles) and then immersed in 2% Basic Fuchsin solution for 72 h. Each tooth was sectioned and examined for dye penetration under a stereomicroscope (x 60 magnification). RESULTS: No dye penetration was seen in 19 (29.6%) of the teeth in the test group and 36 (56.2%) of the teeth in the control group. Dye had penetrated to the base of the fissure in 31 (48.4%) of the teeth in the test group and 23 (35.9%) of the teeth in the control group. Using a chi-square test for trend, the frequency of microleakage was significantly higher in the test group compared to the controls (P < 0.016). CONCLUSION: Prophylaxis has a role in improving sealant retention. Removing this step may cause an increase in microleakage.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effect of pumice prophylaxis on the level of microleakage around and between the sealant and enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 32 freshly extracted sound upper first premolars, assigned as suitable for sealant application, were chosen and divided randomly into two groups: (1) a test group, without prophylaxis; and (2) a control group, with prophylaxis. Sealant was applied to all teeth using the same conventional technique, with prophylaxis being omitted in the test group. The sealed teeth were thermocycled (120 x 30 s, 5 and 55 degrees C cycles) and then immersed in 2% Basic Fuchsin solution for 72 h. Each tooth was sectioned and examined for dye penetration under a stereomicroscope (x 60 magnification). RESULTS: No dye penetration was seen in 19 (29.6%) of the teeth in the test group and 36 (56.2%) of the teeth in the control group. Dye had penetrated to the base of the fissure in 31 (48.4%) of the teeth in the test group and 23 (35.9%) of the teeth in the control group. Using a chi-square test for trend, the frequency of microleakage was significantly higher in the test group compared to the controls (P < 0.016). CONCLUSION: Prophylaxis has a role in improving sealant retention. Removing this step may cause an increase in microleakage.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effect of pumice prophylaxis on the level of microleakage around and between the sealant and enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 32 freshly extracted sound upper first premolars, assigned as suitable for sealant application, were chosen and divided randomly into two groups: (1) a test group, without prophylaxis; and (2) a control group, with prophylaxis. Sealant was applied to all teeth using the same conventional technique, with prophylaxis being omitted in the test group. The sealed teeth were thermocycled (120 x 30 s, 5 and 55 degrees C cycles) and then immersed in 2% Basic Fuchsin solution for 72 h. Each tooth was sectioned and examined for dye penetration under a stereomicroscope (x 60 magnification). RESULTS: No dye penetration was seen in 19 (29.6%) of the teeth in the test group and 36 (56.2%) of the teeth in the control group. Dye had penetrated to the base of the fissure in 31 (48.4%) of the teeth in the test group and 23 (35.9%) of the teeth in the control group. Using a chi-square test for trend, the frequency of microleakage was significantly higher in the test group compared to the controls (P < 0.016). CONCLUSION: Prophylaxis has a role in improving sealant retention. Removing this step may cause an increase in microleakage.

Key concepts: Sealant, Medicine, Dentistry, Stereo microscope, Molar, Magnification, Enamel paint, Pumice

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Microleakage assessment of pit and fissure sealant with and without the use of pumice prophylaxis — Research Paper | ScholarLens