2006GeophysicsRequires access

Estimation of velocity and attenuation coefficient maps from crosswell seismic data

René-Édouard Plessix

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

Abstract Using a classic traveltime tomography and an attenuation tomography based on the centroid frequency shift method, velocity and attenuation coefficient tomograms are computed from two crosswell seismic data. Because of the limited frequency band of the data and the difficulties of picking the first transmitted events, velocity and attenuation coefficients are assumed independent of frequency during the processing, meaning that the attenuation linearly increases with frequency. This reduces the possibility of using a theoretical model to interpret the results. Moreover, attenuation results include both scattering and viscous attenuation. Nevertheless, the attenuation coefficient tomograms confirm some of the features seen in the velocity tomograms: The sand zones show a higher attenuation, although the shale zones and the seals of the reservoirs show a lower attenuation. With a Kramers-Kronig relation for the dispersion formula based on frequency-independent attenuation coefficient, the smooth part of the measured sonic velocity could be approximated from the seismic velocity and attenuation coefficient.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Using a classic traveltime tomography and an attenuation tomography based on the centroid frequency shift method, velocity and attenuation coefficient tomograms are computed from two crosswell seismic data. Because of the limited frequency band of the data and the difficulties of picking the first transmitted events, velocity and attenuation coefficients are assumed independent of frequency during the processing, meaning that the attenuation linearly increases with frequency. This reduces the possibility of using a theoretical model to interpret the results. Moreover, attenuation results include both scattering and viscous attenuation. Nevertheless, the attenuation coefficient tomograms confirm some of the features seen in the velocity tomograms: The sand zones show a higher attenuation, although the shale zones and the seals of the reservoirs show a lower attenuation. With a Kramers-Kronig relation for the dispersion formula based on frequency-independent attenuation coefficient, the smooth part of the measured sonic velocity could be approximated from the seismic velocity and attenuation coefficient.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Using a classic traveltime tomography and an attenuation tomography based on the centroid frequency shift method, velocity and attenuation coefficient tomograms are computed from two crosswell seismic data. Because of the limited frequency band of the data and the difficulties of picking the first transmitted events, velocity and attenuation coefficients are assumed independent of frequency during the processing, meaning that the attenuation linearly increases with frequency. This reduces the possibility of using a theoretical model to interpret the results. Moreover, attenuation results include both scattering and viscous attenuation. Nevertheless, the attenuation coefficient tomograms confirm some of the features seen in the velocity tomograms: The sand zones show a higher attenuation, although the shale zones and the seals of the reservoirs show a lower attenuation. With a Kramers-Kronig relation for the dispersion formula based on frequency-independent attenuation coefficient, the smooth part of the measured sonic velocity could be approximated from the seismic velocity and attenuation coefficient.

Key concepts: Attenuation, Attenuation coefficient, Geology, Anelastic attenuation factor, Tomography, Dispersion (optics), Velocity dispersion, Centroid

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Estimation of velocity and attenuation coefficient maps from crosswell seismic data — Research Paper | ScholarLens