1995Addiction Research & TheoryRequires access

World Views of Alcoholics Anonymous, Women for Sobriety, and Adult Children of Alcoholics/ Al-Anon Mutual Help Groups

Keith Humphreys, Lee Ann Kaskutas

Open publisher page 31 citations

Abstract

Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), Women For Sobriety (WFS), and Al-Anon affiliated Adult Children of Alcoholics (ACoA/Al-Anon) mutual help groups each have different world views/philosophies regarding how to deal with alcohol-related problems. As members learn the world view of their mutual help organization, their perceptions are altered in multiple life domains. AA's world view emphasizes that members' self-centeredness causes suffering and should be overcome through surrender to a spiritual higher power. In contrast, WFS endorses the idea that individuals should be self-reliant and solve their problems through willpower and rational analysis. ACoA/Al-Anon represents a philosophical middle ground between AA and WFS, limiting members' sense of their own worth and importance in some respects and enhancing it in others. We discuss the bases of the three organizations' world views in various philosophical traditions and analyze their implications for organizational functioning. We also evaluate Antze's (1979) hypothesis that world views serve as a “cognitive antidote” for mutual help group members' problems.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), Women For Sobriety (WFS), and Al-Anon affiliated Adult Children of Alcoholics (ACoA/Al-Anon) mutual help groups each have different world views/philosophies regarding how to deal with alcohol-related problems. As members learn the world view of their mutual help organization, their perceptions are altered in multiple life domains. AA's world view emphasizes that members' self-centeredness causes suffering and should be overcome through surrender to a spiritual higher power. In contrast, WFS endorses the idea that individuals should be self-reliant and solve their problems through willpower and rational analysis. ACoA/Al-Anon represents a philosophical middle ground between AA and WFS, limiting members' sense of their own worth and importance in some respects and enhancing it in others. We discuss the bases of the three organizations' world views in various philosophical traditions and analyze their implications for organizational functioning. We also evaluate Antze's (1979) hypothesis that world views serve as a “cognitive antidote” for mutual help group members' problems.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 31 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), Women For Sobriety (WFS), and Al-Anon affiliated Adult Children of Alcoholics (ACoA/Al-Anon) mutual help groups each have different world views/philosophies regarding how to deal with alcohol-related problems. As members learn the world view of their mutual help organization, their perceptions are altered in multiple life domains. AA's world view emphasizes that members' self-centeredness causes suffering and should be overcome through surrender to a spiritual higher power. In contrast, WFS endorses the idea that individuals should be self-reliant and solve their problems through willpower and rational analysis. ACoA/Al-Anon represents a philosophical middle ground between AA and WFS, limiting members' sense of their own worth and importance in some respects and enhancing it in others. We discuss the bases of the three organizations' world views in various philosophical traditions and analyze their implications for organizational functioning. We also evaluate Antze's (1979) hypothesis that world views serve as a “cognitive antidote” for mutual help group members' problems.

Key concepts: Sobriety, Surrender, Alcoholics Anonymous, Psychology, Rationality, Social psychology, Power (physics), Psychotherapist

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
World Views of Alcoholics Anonymous, Women for Sobriety, and Adult Children of Alcoholics/ Al-Anon Mutual Help Groups — Research Paper | ScholarLens