1989International Journal of EpidemiologyRequires access

Gallstone Growth, Size, and Risk of Gallbladder Cancer: An Interracial Study

Albert B. Lowenfels, Alexander M. Walker, D P ALTHAUS, Giles Townsend, L Domellöf

Open publisher page 180 citations

Abstract

To investigate gallstone size, growth, and the relation between stone size and gallbladder cancer we have used cholecystectomy reports from 1676 female subjects (169 Whites, 531 Blacks, and 976 Native American Indians). Although the prevalence of gallstones differs markedly in these groups it appears that the estimated growth rate of gallstones in younger subjects, 2.0 mm per year (95% confidence interval: 1.7-2.3 mm) is homogeneous for all three groups. In both Indian and non-Indian populations the proportion of small stones diminished and the proportion of large stones increased over time. We found a strong relationship between gallstone size and gallbladder cancer. Large stones (greater than or equal to 3 cm) were found in 40% of patients with gallbladder cancer but in only 12% of all subjects of similar age. The relative risk for gallbladder cancer in subjects with stones greater than or equal to 3 cm was 9.2 compared with subjects with stones less than 1 cm. (95% confidence interval: 2.3-37). We estimate that one-third of all gallbladder cancers in subjects with calculi will be associated with large (greater than or equal to 3 cm) stones. We believe that stone size might be used to determine the risk of gallbladder cancer in patients with gallstones.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To investigate gallstone size, growth, and the relation between stone size and gallbladder cancer we have used cholecystectomy reports from 1676 female subjects (169 Whites, 531 Blacks, and 976 Native American Indians). Although the prevalence of gallstones differs markedly in these groups it appears that the estimated growth rate of gallstones in younger subjects, 2.0 mm per year (95% confidence interval: 1.7-2.3 mm) is homogeneous for all three groups. In both Indian and non-Indian populations the proportion of small stones diminished and the proportion of large stones increased over time. We found a strong relationship between gallstone size and gallbladder cancer. Large stones (greater than or equal to 3 cm) were found in 40% of patients with gallbladder cancer but in only 12% of all subjects of similar age. The relative risk for gallbladder cancer in subjects with stones greater than or equal to 3 cm was 9.2 compared with subjects with stones less than 1 cm. (95% confidence interval: 2.3-37). We estimate that one-third of all gallbladder cancers in subjects with calculi will be associated with large (greater than or equal to 3 cm) stones. We believe that stone size might be used to determine the risk of gallbladder cancer in patients with gallstones.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 180 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To investigate gallstone size, growth, and the relation between stone size and gallbladder cancer we have used cholecystectomy reports from 1676 female subjects (169 Whites, 531 Blacks, and 976 Native American Indians). Although the prevalence of gallstones differs markedly in these groups it appears that the estimated growth rate of gallstones in younger subjects, 2.0 mm per year (95% confidence interval: 1.7-2.3 mm) is homogeneous for all three groups. In both Indian and non-Indian populations the proportion of small stones diminished and the proportion of large stones increased over time. We found a strong relationship between gallstone size and gallbladder cancer. Large stones (greater than or equal to 3 cm) were found in 40% of patients with gallbladder cancer but in only 12% of all subjects of similar age. The relative risk for gallbladder cancer in subjects with stones greater than or equal to 3 cm was 9.2 compared with subjects with stones less than 1 cm. (95% confidence interval: 2.3-37). We estimate that one-third of all gallbladder cancers in subjects with calculi will be associated with large (greater than or equal to 3 cm) stones. We believe that stone size might be used to determine the risk of gallbladder cancer in patients with gallstones.

Key concepts: Gallstones, Gallbladder cancer, Medicine, Gallbladder, Cholecystectomy, Confidence interval, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Gallstone Growth, Size, and Risk of Gallbladder Cancer: An Interracial Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens