2004Advances in transportation studiesRequires access

DRIVING BEHAVIOR ON SPLIT 2+1 LANE ROAD

Jyrki Kaistinen, Tapio Nieminen, Heikki Summala

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

This research studied reasons for the known capacity and safety benefits of the split 2+1 roads by measuring driving behavior with a floating vehicle method and roadside videotaping. Measures from a split 2+1 lane road and 2-lane wide-shoulder road were compared. Results showed that drivers appeared to take advantage of the improved passing opportunity on the 2+1 road and passed more vehicles at once. Passing times of a single passed vehicle at once were clearly longer on the split 2+1 road, indicating a more relaxed passing maneuver, but also hindering some vehicles behind from passing. The split 2+1 road did not generate more speeding than the wide-shoulder road, but over 80% of the passing vehicles exceeded the speed limit on both road types. Transfer of passing behavior from a split 2+1 road to the subsequent wide-shoulder road was also studied, but no effects were found on gap acceptance. Passing vehicles merging to the base lane at the end of passing lanes did not cause major disturbances in traffic flow. Occasional reduction in vehicle velocities and brakedowns of traffic flow occurred during peak rush hours on the longest no passing segment of the road. According to roadside interviews, a majority of drivers seem to accept and prefer the 2+1 lane road.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This research studied reasons for the known capacity and safety benefits of the split 2+1 roads by measuring driving behavior with a floating vehicle method and roadside videotaping. Measures from a split 2+1 lane road and 2-lane wide-shoulder road were compared. Results showed that drivers appeared to take advantage of the improved passing opportunity on the 2+1 road and passed more vehicles at once. Passing times of a single passed vehicle at once were clearly longer on the split 2+1 road, indicating a more relaxed passing maneuver, but also hindering some vehicles behind from passing. The split 2+1 road did not generate more speeding than the wide-shoulder road, but over 80% of the passing vehicles exceeded the speed limit on both road types. Transfer of passing behavior from a split 2+1 road to the subsequent wide-shoulder road was also studied, but no effects were found on gap acceptance. Passing vehicles merging to the base lane at the end of passing lanes did not cause major disturbances in traffic flow. Occasional reduction in vehicle velocities and brakedowns of traffic flow occurred during peak rush hours on the longest no passing segment of the road. According to roadside interviews, a majority of drivers seem to accept and prefer the 2+1 lane road.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This research studied reasons for the known capacity and safety benefits of the split 2+1 roads by measuring driving behavior with a floating vehicle method and roadside videotaping. Measures from a split 2+1 lane road and 2-lane wide-shoulder road were compared. Results showed that drivers appeared to take advantage of the improved passing opportunity on the 2+1 road and passed more vehicles at once. Passing times of a single passed vehicle at once were clearly longer on the split 2+1 road, indicating a more relaxed passing maneuver, but also hindering some vehicles behind from passing. The split 2+1 road did not generate more speeding than the wide-shoulder road, but over 80% of the passing vehicles exceeded the speed limit on both road types. Transfer of passing behavior from a split 2+1 road to the subsequent wide-shoulder road was also studied, but no effects were found on gap acceptance. Passing vehicles merging to the base lane at the end of passing lanes did not cause major disturbances in traffic flow. Occasional reduction in vehicle velocities and brakedowns of traffic flow occurred during peak rush hours on the longest no passing segment of the road. According to roadside interviews, a majority of drivers seem to accept and prefer the 2+1 lane road.

Key concepts: Transport engineering, Speed limit, Traffic flow (computer networking), Road traffic, Transfer (computing), Computer science, Engineering, Computer security

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
DRIVING BEHAVIOR ON SPLIT 2+1 LANE ROAD — Research Paper | ScholarLens