Sequence effects of disturbance on community structure
Tadashi Fukami
Abstract
Tadashi Fukami
Abstract
The sequence in which disturbance events occur has the potential to affect the structure of ecological communities, but its role has been generally overlooked. Most disturbance studies have focused on the frequency or intensity of disturbance, probably reflecting the influence of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. To investigate the effects of disturbance sequence on community structure, I created laboratory microcosms of protists and small metazoans analogous to communities found in water‐filled bamboo stumps. Using drought (disturbance D) and larval mosquito addition (disturbance M), I examined the following five treatments of disturbance sequence: D‐M‐D‐M, D‐D‐M‐M, M‐D‐M‐D, M‐M‐D‐D, and no disturbance as a control. The response of species to disturbance varied between disturbance types (D or M) as well as among species, and disturbance effects depended on previous disturbance events. As a result, disturbance sequence drove the microcosms onto different successional trajectories, sometimes leading to divergence in final community states in terms of species richness or species composition and relative abundance. This divergence occurred even under the same frequency and intensity of disturbance. These results suggest that historical information on disturbance sequence can be essential for explaining variation in community structure. The interaction of sequence with frequency and intensity likely enhances the role played by disturbance in ecological communities.
OpenAlex reports 49 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The sequence in which disturbance events occur has the potential to affect the structure of ecological communities, but its role has been generally overlooked. Most disturbance studies have focused on the frequency or intensity of disturbance, probably reflecting the influence of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. To investigate the effects of disturbance sequence on community structure, I created laboratory microcosms of protists and small metazoans analogous to communities found in water‐filled bamboo stumps. Using drought (disturbance D) and larval mosquito addition (disturbance M), I examined the following five treatments of disturbance sequence: D‐M‐D‐M, D‐D‐M‐M, M‐D‐M‐D, M‐M‐D‐D, and no disturbance as a control. The response of species to disturbance varied between disturbance types (D or M) as well as among species, and disturbance effects depended on previous disturbance events. As a result, disturbance sequence drove the microcosms onto different successional trajectories, sometimes leading to divergence in final community states in terms of species richness or species composition and relative abundance. This divergence occurred even under the same frequency and intensity of disturbance. These results suggest that historical information on disturbance sequence can be essential for explaining variation in community structure. The interaction of sequence with frequency and intensity likely enhances the role played by disturbance in ecological communities.
Key concepts: Disturbance (geology), Ecology, Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis, Community structure, Microcosm, Species richness, Abundance (ecology), Ecological succession