1994AnesthesiologyOpen access

Rate and Gender Dependence of the Sweating, Vasoconstriction, and Shivering Thresholds in Humans

Michael Lopez, Daniel I. Sessler, Kristin Walter, Thomas Emerick, Makoto Ozaki

Open full text 275 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The range of core temperatures not triggering thermoregulatory responses ("interthreshold range") remains to be determined in humans. Although the rates at which perioperative core temperatures vary typically range from 0.5 to 2 degrees C/h, the thermoregulatory contribution of different core cooling rates also remains unknown. In addition, sweating in women is triggered at a slightly greater core temperature than in men. However, it is unknown whether the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds are comparably greater in women, or if women tolerate a larger range of core temperatures without triggering thermoregulatory responses. Accordingly, the authors sought to (1) define the interthreshold range; (2) test the hypothesis that, at a constant skin temperature, the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds are greater during rapid core cooling than during slowly induced hypothermia; and (3) compare the sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering thresholds in men and women. METHODS: Eight men and eight women participated. The men participated on 2 separate days; no anesthesia or sedatives were administered. On each day, they were cutaneously warmed until sweating was induced and then were cooled by a central venous infusion of cold fluid. The cooling rates were 0.7 +/- 0.1 degrees C/h on 1 day and 1.7 +/- 0.4 degrees C/h on the other, randomly ordered. Skin temperature was maintained near 36.7 degrees C throughout each trial. The women were studied only once, in the follicular phase of their menstrual cycles, at the greater cooling rate. RESULTS: The interthreshold range was approximately 0.2 degrees C in both men and women, but all thermoregulatory response thresholds were approximately 0.3 degrees C higher in women. All thresholds were virtually identical during slow and fast core cooling. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm the existence of an interthreshold range and document that its magnitude is small. They also demonstrate that the interthreshold range does not differ in men and women, but that women thermoregulate at a significantly higher temperature than do men. Typical clinical rates of core cooling do not alter thermoregulatory responses.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: The range of core temperatures not triggering thermoregulatory responses ("interthreshold range") remains to be determined in humans. Although the rates at which perioperative core temperatures vary typically range from 0.5 to 2 degrees C/h, the thermoregulatory contribution of different core cooling rates also remains unknown. In addition, sweating in women is triggered at a slightly greater core temperature than in men. However, it is unknown whether the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds are comparably greater in women, or if women tolerate a larger range of core temperatures without triggering thermoregulatory responses. Accordingly, the authors sought to (1) define the interthreshold range; (2) test the hypothesis that, at a constant skin temperature, the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds are greater during rapid core cooling than during slowly induced hypothermia; and (3) compare the sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering thresholds in men and women. METHODS: Eight men and eight women participated. The men participated on 2 separate days; no anesthesia or sedatives were administered. On each day, they were cutaneously warmed until sweating was induced and then were cooled by a central venous infusion of cold fluid. The cooling rates were 0.7 +/- 0.1 degrees C/h on 1 day and 1.7 +/- 0.4 degrees C/h on the other, randomly ordered. Skin temperature was maintained near 36.7 degrees C throughout each trial. The women were studied only once, in the follicular phase of their menstrual cycles, at the greater cooling rate. RESULTS: The interthreshold range was approximately 0.2 degrees C in both men and women, but all thermoregulatory response thresholds were approximately 0.3 degrees C higher in women. All thresholds were virtually identical during slow and fast core cooling. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm the existence of an interthreshold range and document that its magnitude is small. They also demonstrate that the interthreshold range does not differ in men and women, but that women thermoregulate at a significantly higher temperature than do men. Typical clinical rates of core cooling do not alter thermoregulatory responses.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 275 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: The range of core temperatures not triggering thermoregulatory responses ("interthreshold range") remains to be determined in humans. Although the rates at which perioperative core temperatures vary typically range from 0.5 to 2 degrees C/h, the thermoregulatory contribution of different core cooling rates also remains unknown. In addition, sweating in women is triggered at a slightly greater core temperature than in men. However, it is unknown whether the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds are comparably greater in women, or if women tolerate a larger range of core temperatures without triggering thermoregulatory responses. Accordingly, the authors sought to (1) define the interthreshold range; (2) test the hypothesis that, at a constant skin temperature, the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds are greater during rapid core cooling than during slowly induced hypothermia; and (3) compare the sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering thresholds in men and women. METHODS: Eight men and eight women participated. The men participated on 2 separate days; no anesthesia or sedatives were administered. On each day, they were cutaneously warmed until sweating was induced and then were cooled by a central venous infusion of cold fluid. The cooling rates were 0.7 +/- 0.1 degrees C/h on 1 day and 1.7 +/- 0.4 degrees C/h on the other, randomly ordered. Skin temperature was maintained near 36.7 degrees C throughout each trial. The women were studied only once, in the follicular phase of their menstrual cycles, at the greater cooling rate. RESULTS: The interthreshold range was approximately 0.2 degrees C in both men and women, but all thermoregulatory response thresholds were approximately 0.3 degrees C higher in women. All thresholds were virtually identical during slow and fast core cooling. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm the existence of an interthreshold range and document that its magnitude is small. They also demonstrate that the interthreshold range does not differ in men and women, but that women thermoregulate at a significantly higher temperature than do men. Typical clinical rates of core cooling do not alter thermoregulatory responses.

Key concepts: Shivering, Thermoregulation, Vasoconstriction, Hypothermia, Medicine, Core temperature, Core (optical fiber), Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rate and Gender Dependence of the Sweating, Vasoconstriction, and Shivering Thresholds in Humans — Research Paper | ScholarLens