2012•Law Culture and the HumanitiesRequires access

American Labor and American Law: Exceptionalism and its Politics in the Decline of the American Labor Movement

Gerald C. Friedman

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Since Werner Sombart visited the United States at the beginning of the 20th century, scholars and activists have debated whether the American labor movement is “exceptionally” weak and conservative, and why. While some have accepted Exceptionalism and attributed it to the conservative values of American workers, others have attributed it instead to the power of business and the repressive posture of the American government. This article argues that the American legal tradition contributed to “exceptionalism” by privileging individual rights over collective action, and by limiting the power of organizations, including governments as well as unions, over individual choice. While this individualist bias was modified in the 1930s, the Supreme Court quickly restored the individual bias in American labor law, leading to the collapse of unions in the later 20th century.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since Werner Sombart visited the United States at the beginning of the 20th century, scholars and activists have debated whether the American labor movement is “exceptionally” weak and conservative, and why. While some have accepted Exceptionalism and attributed it to the conservative values of American workers, others have attributed it instead to the power of business and the repressive posture of the American government. This article argues that the American legal tradition contributed to “exceptionalism” by privileging individual rights over collective action, and by limiting the power of organizations, including governments as well as unions, over individual choice. While this individualist bias was modified in the 1930s, the Supreme Court quickly restored the individual bias in American labor law, leading to the collapse of unions in the later 20th century.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since Werner Sombart visited the United States at the beginning of the 20th century, scholars and activists have debated whether the American labor movement is “exceptionally” weak and conservative, and why. While some have accepted Exceptionalism and attributed it to the conservative values of American workers, others have attributed it instead to the power of business and the repressive posture of the American government. This article argues that the American legal tradition contributed to “exceptionalism” by privileging individual rights over collective action, and by limiting the power of organizations, including governments as well as unions, over individual choice. While this individualist bias was modified in the 1930s, the Supreme Court quickly restored the individual bias in American labor law, leading to the collapse of unions in the later 20th century.

Key concepts: American exceptionalism, Supreme court, Exceptionalism, Politics, Individualism, Power (physics), Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
American Labor and American Law: Exceptionalism and its Politics in the Decline of the American Labor Movement — Research Paper | ScholarLens